DaddyFrosty/yoga
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 96 Pull Requests 31 Actions Packages Projects Releases 33 Wiki Activity
Files
5009f5c1accb3dde14e1e18930df70c18c70dc75
yoga/tests/generated/YGAspectRatioTest.cpp

169 lines
8.4 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
/*
* Copyright (c) Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates.
*
* This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Sign generated tests (#1503) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1503 This diff makes it so that our driver will sign all of the generated files to help ensure that they are not edited by hand. Next I will add CI to actually verify the signature Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D51966201 fbshipit-source-id: f7e3f4fde1c98832212a448b2dcc8e21be0560c4
2023-12-14 11:48:22 -08:00
*
* clang-format off
Fix `misc-misplaced-const` warnings in Yoga tests (#1677) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1677 We have Clang Tidy warnings enabled internally, that will flag `const YG*Ref` as misleading, as a const pointer to non-const, instead of non-const pointer to const. Let's remove all the misleading const in existing tests, and generated tests. Reviewed By: joevilches Differential Revision: D59335968 fbshipit-source-id: c66af878904ba7900f8ffcd99162968d90f8e5c7
2024-07-03 17:30:10 -07:00
* @generated SignedSource<<bca5b9517b7a728b30eb070a33de0bdf>>
Sign generated tests (#1503) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1503 This diff makes it so that our driver will sign all of the generated files to help ensure that they are not edited by hand. Next I will add CI to actually verify the signature Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D51966201 fbshipit-source-id: f7e3f4fde1c98832212a448b2dcc8e21be0560c4
2023-12-14 11:48:22 -08:00
* generated by gentest/gentest-driver.ts from gentest/fixtures/YGAspectRatioTest.html
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
*/
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <yoga/Yoga.h>
Add test support for intrinsic sized nodes (#1671) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1671 This diff adds support for intrinsic sizing in generated tests. This is done by importing a testing font called "Ahem" which, as used, has an exact width and height of 10px for each character. Support has been added for C++, Java, and Javascript generated tests. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D58307002 fbshipit-source-id: e1dcc1e03310d35a32e0c70f71994880d8f7de55
2024-06-26 10:00:17 -07:00
#include "../util/TestUtil.h"
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
TEST(YogaTest, aspect_ratio_does_not_stretch_cross_axis_dim) {
GTEST_SKIP();
Fix `misc-misplaced-const` warnings in Yoga tests (#1677) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1677 We have Clang Tidy warnings enabled internally, that will flag `const YG*Ref` as misleading, as a const pointer to non-const, instead of non-const pointer to const. Let's remove all the misleading const in existing tests, and generated tests. Reviewed By: joevilches Differential Revision: D59335968 fbshipit-source-id: c66af878904ba7900f8ffcd99162968d90f8e5c7
2024-07-03 17:30:10 -07:00
YGConfigRef config = YGConfigNew();
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
Fix `misc-misplaced-const` warnings in Yoga tests (#1677) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1677 We have Clang Tidy warnings enabled internally, that will flag `const YG*Ref` as misleading, as a const pointer to non-const, instead of non-const pointer to const. Let's remove all the misleading const in existing tests, and generated tests. Reviewed By: joevilches Differential Revision: D59335968 fbshipit-source-id: c66af878904ba7900f8ffcd99162968d90f8e5c7
2024-07-03 17:30:10 -07:00
YGNodeRef root = YGNodeNewWithConfig(config);
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
YGNodeStyleSetPositionType(root, YGPositionTypeAbsolute);
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
YGNodeStyleSetWidth(root, 300);
YGNodeStyleSetHeight(root, 300);
Fix `misc-misplaced-const` warnings in Yoga tests (#1677) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1677 We have Clang Tidy warnings enabled internally, that will flag `const YG*Ref` as misleading, as a const pointer to non-const, instead of non-const pointer to const. Let's remove all the misleading const in existing tests, and generated tests. Reviewed By: joevilches Differential Revision: D59335968 fbshipit-source-id: c66af878904ba7900f8ffcd99162968d90f8e5c7
2024-07-03 17:30:10 -07:00
YGNodeRef root_child0 = YGNodeNewWithConfig(config);
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
YGNodeStyleSetOverflow(root_child0, YGOverflowScroll);
YGNodeStyleSetFlexGrow(root_child0, 1);
YGNodeStyleSetFlexShrink(root_child0, 1);
YGNodeStyleSetFlexBasisPercent(root_child0, 0);
YGNodeInsertChild(root, root_child0, 0);
Fix `misc-misplaced-const` warnings in Yoga tests (#1677) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1677 We have Clang Tidy warnings enabled internally, that will flag `const YG*Ref` as misleading, as a const pointer to non-const, instead of non-const pointer to const. Let's remove all the misleading const in existing tests, and generated tests. Reviewed By: joevilches Differential Revision: D59335968 fbshipit-source-id: c66af878904ba7900f8ffcd99162968d90f8e5c7
2024-07-03 17:30:10 -07:00
YGNodeRef root_child0_child0 = YGNodeNewWithConfig(config);
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
YGNodeStyleSetFlexDirection(root_child0_child0, YGFlexDirectionRow);
YGNodeInsertChild(root_child0, root_child0_child0, 0);
Fix `misc-misplaced-const` warnings in Yoga tests (#1677) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1677 We have Clang Tidy warnings enabled internally, that will flag `const YG*Ref` as misleading, as a const pointer to non-const, instead of non-const pointer to const. Let's remove all the misleading const in existing tests, and generated tests. Reviewed By: joevilches Differential Revision: D59335968 fbshipit-source-id: c66af878904ba7900f8ffcd99162968d90f8e5c7
2024-07-03 17:30:10 -07:00
YGNodeRef root_child0_child0_child0 = YGNodeNewWithConfig(config);
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
YGNodeStyleSetFlexGrow(root_child0_child0_child0, 2);
YGNodeStyleSetFlexShrink(root_child0_child0_child0, 1);
YGNodeStyleSetFlexBasisPercent(root_child0_child0_child0, 0);
YGNodeStyleSetAspectRatio(root_child0_child0_child0, 1 / 1);
YGNodeInsertChild(root_child0_child0, root_child0_child0_child0, 0);
Fix `misc-misplaced-const` warnings in Yoga tests (#1677) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1677 We have Clang Tidy warnings enabled internally, that will flag `const YG*Ref` as misleading, as a const pointer to non-const, instead of non-const pointer to const. Let's remove all the misleading const in existing tests, and generated tests. Reviewed By: joevilches Differential Revision: D59335968 fbshipit-source-id: c66af878904ba7900f8ffcd99162968d90f8e5c7
2024-07-03 17:30:10 -07:00
YGNodeRef root_child0_child0_child1 = YGNodeNewWithConfig(config);
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
YGNodeStyleSetWidth(root_child0_child0_child1, 5);
YGNodeInsertChild(root_child0_child0, root_child0_child0_child1, 1);
Fix `misc-misplaced-const` warnings in Yoga tests (#1677) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1677 We have Clang Tidy warnings enabled internally, that will flag `const YG*Ref` as misleading, as a const pointer to non-const, instead of non-const pointer to const. Let's remove all the misleading const in existing tests, and generated tests. Reviewed By: joevilches Differential Revision: D59335968 fbshipit-source-id: c66af878904ba7900f8ffcd99162968d90f8e5c7
2024-07-03 17:30:10 -07:00
YGNodeRef root_child0_child0_child2 = YGNodeNewWithConfig(config);
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
YGNodeStyleSetFlexGrow(root_child0_child0_child2, 1);
YGNodeStyleSetFlexShrink(root_child0_child0_child2, 1);
YGNodeStyleSetFlexBasisPercent(root_child0_child0_child2, 0);
YGNodeInsertChild(root_child0_child0, root_child0_child0_child2, 2);
Fix `misc-misplaced-const` warnings in Yoga tests (#1677) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1677 We have Clang Tidy warnings enabled internally, that will flag `const YG*Ref` as misleading, as a const pointer to non-const, instead of non-const pointer to const. Let's remove all the misleading const in existing tests, and generated tests. Reviewed By: joevilches Differential Revision: D59335968 fbshipit-source-id: c66af878904ba7900f8ffcd99162968d90f8e5c7
2024-07-03 17:30:10 -07:00
YGNodeRef root_child0_child0_child2_child0 = YGNodeNewWithConfig(config);
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
YGNodeStyleSetFlexGrow(root_child0_child0_child2_child0, 1);
YGNodeStyleSetFlexShrink(root_child0_child0_child2_child0, 1);
YGNodeStyleSetFlexBasisPercent(root_child0_child0_child2_child0, 0);
YGNodeStyleSetAspectRatio(root_child0_child0_child2_child0, 1 / 1);
YGNodeInsertChild(root_child0_child0_child2, root_child0_child0_child2_child0, 0);
Fix `misc-misplaced-const` warnings in Yoga tests (#1677) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1677 We have Clang Tidy warnings enabled internally, that will flag `const YG*Ref` as misleading, as a const pointer to non-const, instead of non-const pointer to const. Let's remove all the misleading const in existing tests, and generated tests. Reviewed By: joevilches Differential Revision: D59335968 fbshipit-source-id: c66af878904ba7900f8ffcd99162968d90f8e5c7
2024-07-03 17:30:10 -07:00
YGNodeRef root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child0 = YGNodeNewWithConfig(config);
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
YGNodeStyleSetWidth(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child0, 5);
YGNodeInsertChild(root_child0_child0_child2_child0, root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child0, 0);
Fix `misc-misplaced-const` warnings in Yoga tests (#1677) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1677 We have Clang Tidy warnings enabled internally, that will flag `const YG*Ref` as misleading, as a const pointer to non-const, instead of non-const pointer to const. Let's remove all the misleading const in existing tests, and generated tests. Reviewed By: joevilches Differential Revision: D59335968 fbshipit-source-id: c66af878904ba7900f8ffcd99162968d90f8e5c7
2024-07-03 17:30:10 -07:00
YGNodeRef root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1 = YGNodeNewWithConfig(config);
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
YGNodeStyleSetFlexGrow(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1, 1);
YGNodeStyleSetFlexShrink(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1, 1);
YGNodeStyleSetFlexBasisPercent(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1, 0);
YGNodeStyleSetAspectRatio(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1, 1 / 1);
YGNodeInsertChild(root_child0_child0_child2_child0, root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1, 1);
YGNodeCalculateLayout(root, YGUndefined, YGUndefined, YGDirectionLTR);
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(300, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(300, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(300, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(300, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(300, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child0));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child0));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child1));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child1));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(5, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child1));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child1));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(202, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child2));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child2));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(98, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child2));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child2));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child2_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child2_child0));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(98, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child2_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child2_child0));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(5, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(98, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
YGNodeCalculateLayout(root, YGUndefined, YGUndefined, YGDirectionRTL);
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(300, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(300, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(300, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(300, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(300, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(103, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child0));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child0));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child0));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(98, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child1));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child1));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(5, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child1));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child1));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child2));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child2));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(98, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child2));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child2));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child2_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child2_child0));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(98, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child2_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child2_child0));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(93, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child0));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(5, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child0));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetLeft(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(0, YGNodeLayoutGetTop(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1));
gentest support for position: static + initial test Summary: I am about to embark on supporting `position: static` in Yoga. The enum exists already (and is the default position type, lol) but does not actually do anything and just behaves like `position: relative`. My approach here is to write a bunch of tests to test for the various behaviors of static positions and then develop on Yoga afterwards to get those tests passing. To do this, we need to make a few changes to the gentest files as there is not support for adding `position: static` at the moment: * Make it so that the gentest code can physically write `YGPositionTypeStatic` if it encounters `position: static` in the style * Make it so that gentest.js knows that Yoga's default is actually static. This way the code generated in the tests will actually label nodes for non default values * Explicitly label the position type even when it is not declared in the style prop (with the exception of the default) * Regenerate all the tests Additionally I added the first, basic test: making sure insets do nothing on a statically positioned element. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50437855 fbshipit-source-id: 0e8bbf1c224d477ea4592b7563d0b70d2ffa79c8
2023-10-23 18:20:24 -07:00
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(98, YGNodeLayoutGetWidth(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1));
ASSERT_FLOAT_EQ(197, YGNodeLayoutGetHeight(root_child0_child0_child2_child0_child1));
Add test fixture to reproduce bug in aspect-ratio (#1421) Summary: Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1421 Adds repro of inconsistent implementation of aspect-ratio behavior across Web and React Native. Reviewed By: NickGerleman Differential Revision: D50225804 fbshipit-source-id: 0494e0373dcdebc789715b2ec19c002a47d69ce0
2023-10-12 15:02:00 -07:00
YGNodeFreeRecursive(root);
YGConfigFree(config);
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink