DaddyFrosty/yoga
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 96 Pull Requests 31 Actions Packages Projects Releases 33 Wiki Activity
Files
5a257aac85fe5d38f1fdb4840e866249c0800633
yoga/csharp/tests/Facebook.Yoga/YGFlexWrapTest.cs

1744 lines
70 KiB
C#
Raw Normal View History

Fix Generation of Tests from Fixtures Summary: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1116 added a change to the test generator "gentests.rb" to support a newer version of chromedriver, along with a change to the enum generator (not touched in this diff) to produce code consistent with the current tests, which seem to have been manually edited since last generation. I had trouble running the test generator locally, because it relies on unversioned third-party dependencies, whose APIs change. Looking at source history, it seems like each time someone wants to run the script, they end up updating its syntax to match whatever versions they pull in. This change adds a Gemfile and lock so that that the version of "watir" is locked, and so that we will also automatically pull in a consistent "chomedriver" version via the "webdrivers" gem. It includes the updates from the PR to be consistent with already output tests, and I have also updated the copyright header generation to no longer create lint warnings on newly generated tests (some of the previous ones were fixed manually it looks like). The test generator would still produce bodies which would fail clang-format, and were manually edited (causing generation to emit new lint warnings), so I updated the generator to suppress clang-format in the body of the generated files. Three tests, around the interaction of minimum dimensions and flexible children produce different results in Chrome now compared to when the tests were added, so running `gentests.rb` creates tests which break UTs. This doesn't seem like any sort of rounding, or device specific difference, so I have disabled these tests for now. While digging around, it does look like Chrome periodically will fix bugs in its own layout implementation which cause differences, like https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=927066 Reviewed By: rozele, Andrey-Mishanin Differential Revision: D39907416 fbshipit-source-id: f88714ff038b42f935901783452df25eabb6ebb1
2022-09-29 22:25:24 -07:00
/*
* Copyright (c) Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates.
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
*
Fix Generation of Tests from Fixtures Summary: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1116 added a change to the test generator "gentests.rb" to support a newer version of chromedriver, along with a change to the enum generator (not touched in this diff) to produce code consistent with the current tests, which seem to have been manually edited since last generation. I had trouble running the test generator locally, because it relies on unversioned third-party dependencies, whose APIs change. Looking at source history, it seems like each time someone wants to run the script, they end up updating its syntax to match whatever versions they pull in. This change adds a Gemfile and lock so that that the version of "watir" is locked, and so that we will also automatically pull in a consistent "chomedriver" version via the "webdrivers" gem. It includes the updates from the PR to be consistent with already output tests, and I have also updated the copyright header generation to no longer create lint warnings on newly generated tests (some of the previous ones were fixed manually it looks like). The test generator would still produce bodies which would fail clang-format, and were manually edited (causing generation to emit new lint warnings), so I updated the generator to suppress clang-format in the body of the generated files. Three tests, around the interaction of minimum dimensions and flexible children produce different results in Chrome now compared to when the tests were added, so running `gentests.rb` creates tests which break UTs. This doesn't seem like any sort of rounding, or device specific difference, so I have disabled these tests for now. While digging around, it does look like Chrome periodically will fix bugs in its own layout implementation which cause differences, like https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=927066 Reviewed By: rozele, Andrey-Mishanin Differential Revision: D39907416 fbshipit-source-id: f88714ff038b42f935901783452df25eabb6ebb1
2022-09-29 22:25:24 -07:00
* This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the
* LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
*/
Fix Generation of Tests from Fixtures Summary: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1116 added a change to the test generator "gentests.rb" to support a newer version of chromedriver, along with a change to the enum generator (not touched in this diff) to produce code consistent with the current tests, which seem to have been manually edited since last generation. I had trouble running the test generator locally, because it relies on unversioned third-party dependencies, whose APIs change. Looking at source history, it seems like each time someone wants to run the script, they end up updating its syntax to match whatever versions they pull in. This change adds a Gemfile and lock so that that the version of "watir" is locked, and so that we will also automatically pull in a consistent "chomedriver" version via the "webdrivers" gem. It includes the updates from the PR to be consistent with already output tests, and I have also updated the copyright header generation to no longer create lint warnings on newly generated tests (some of the previous ones were fixed manually it looks like). The test generator would still produce bodies which would fail clang-format, and were manually edited (causing generation to emit new lint warnings), so I updated the generator to suppress clang-format in the body of the generated files. Three tests, around the interaction of minimum dimensions and flexible children produce different results in Chrome now compared to when the tests were added, so running `gentests.rb` creates tests which break UTs. This doesn't seem like any sort of rounding, or device specific difference, so I have disabled these tests for now. While digging around, it does look like Chrome periodically will fix bugs in its own layout implementation which cause differences, like https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=927066 Reviewed By: rozele, Andrey-Mishanin Differential Revision: D39907416 fbshipit-source-id: f88714ff038b42f935901783452df25eabb6ebb1
2022-09-29 22:25:24 -07:00
Use lowercase @generated in tests Summary: The presence of lowercase "generated" anywhere in a file means Phabricator and Meta's fork of VSCode will treat the file as generated. Change generated tests to use the exact string. Changelog: [Internal] Reviewed By: yungsters Differential Revision: D41312171 fbshipit-source-id: 2bc8ef450d8377ffbacf443043d115a418db4a2e
2022-11-15 19:51:48 -08:00
// @generated by gentest/gentest.rb from gentest/fixtures/YGFlexWrapTest.html
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
using System;
using NUnit.Framework;
rename csharp code Summary: new name Reviewed By: splhack Differential Revision: D4247106 fbshipit-source-id: 6e1097de104f3a011c78ae65b33e57865b007711
2016-12-02 11:18:16 -08:00
namespace Facebook.Yoga
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
{
[TestFixture]
Rename tests Summary: Rename test files to use new name Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4265235 fbshipit-source-id: 0090d3949828058baf7435f33d4068de92756bad
2016-12-03 04:40:21 -08:00
public class YGFlexWrapTest
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
{
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_column()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root.Height = 100;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child0.Width = 30;
root_child0.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 30;
root_child1.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child2.Width = 30;
root_child2.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child3 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child3.Width = 30;
root_child3.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(3, root_child3);
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.CalculateLayout();
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.CalculateLayout();
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
}
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_row()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root.Width = 100;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child0.Width = 30;
root_child0.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 30;
root_child1.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child2.Width = 30;
root_child2.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child3 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child3.Width = 30;
root_child3.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(3, root_child3);
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.CalculateLayout();
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.CalculateLayout();
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
}
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_row_align_items_flex_end()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root.AlignItems = YogaAlign.FlexEnd;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root.Width = 100;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child0.Width = 30;
root_child0.Height = 10;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 30;
root_child1.Height = 20;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child2.Width = 30;
root_child2.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child3 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child3.Width = 30;
root_child3.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(3, root_child3);
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.CalculateLayout();
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.CalculateLayout();
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
}
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_row_align_items_center()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root.AlignItems = YogaAlign.Center;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root.Width = 100;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child0.Width = 30;
root_child0.Height = 10;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 30;
root_child1.Height = 20;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child2.Width = 30;
root_child2.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child3 = new YogaNode(config);
Add feature to use percentage as value unit Summary: Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit. You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience. I did some benchmarks: ``` Without Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms With Percentage Feature - Release x86: Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258 Reviewed By: dshahidehpour Differential Revision: D4361945 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
2017-01-02 05:20:37 -08:00
root_child3.Width = 30;
root_child3.Height = 30;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.Insert(3, root_child3);
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.CalculateLayout();
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(5f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
Rename enums Summary: new name, start by renaming enums Differential Revision: D4244360 fbshipit-source-id: c9fcbdd231098c9ff230a6055676bbc7cbd11001
2016-12-02 05:47:43 -08:00
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
root.CalculateLayout();
Add experiment support to gentest Summary: This diff does two things - Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller. - Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior. Reviewed By: gkassabli Differential Revision: D4226734 fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
2016-11-23 11:12:51 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(5f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
}
Fix wraping calculation if min-size constraint exists Summary: Fixes #261 Closes https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/pull/262 Reviewed By: splhack Differential Revision: D4245200 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 77d802d71010ed426511d6a01e6de1e7c9194179
2017-01-16 16:09:43 -08:00
[Test]
public void Test_flex_wrap_children_with_min_main_overriding_flex_basis()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
Fix wraping calculation if min-size constraint exists Summary: Fixes #261 Closes https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/pull/262 Reviewed By: splhack Differential Revision: D4245200 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 77d802d71010ed426511d6a01e6de1e7c9194179
2017-01-16 16:09:43 -08:00
root.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
root.Width = 100;
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix wraping calculation if min-size constraint exists Summary: Fixes #261 Closes https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/pull/262 Reviewed By: splhack Differential Revision: D4245200 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 77d802d71010ed426511d6a01e6de1e7c9194179
2017-01-16 16:09:43 -08:00
root_child0.FlexBasis = 50;
root_child0.MinWidth = 55;
root_child0.Height = 50;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix wraping calculation if min-size constraint exists Summary: Fixes #261 Closes https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/pull/262 Reviewed By: splhack Differential Revision: D4245200 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 77d802d71010ed426511d6a01e6de1e7c9194179
2017-01-16 16:09:43 -08:00
root_child1.FlexBasis = 50;
root_child1.MinWidth = 55;
root_child1.Height = 50;
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(55f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(55f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(45f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(55f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(45f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(55f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
}
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
[Test]
public void Test_flex_wrap_wrap_to_child_height()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
root_child0.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root_child0.AlignItems = YogaAlign.FlexStart;
root_child0.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
root_child0_child0.Width = 100;
root_child0.Insert(0, root_child0_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0_child0_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
root_child0_child0_child0.Width = 100;
root_child0_child0_child0.Height = 100;
root_child0_child0.Insert(0, root_child0_child0_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 100;
root_child1.Height = 100;
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
}
[Test]
public void Test_flex_wrap_align_stretch_fits_one_row()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
root.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
root.Width = 150;
root.Height = 100;
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
root_child0.Width = 50;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 50;
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(150f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Fix bugs around `align-content` Summary: @public Regenerating the “golden master” tests with chrome surfaced different bugs around `align-content`: - a misunderstanding that values in `align-content` only applied *if there is only one line.* In fact, it applies *every time* a container is set to `flex-wrap: wrap`. Chrome had this wrong, and as such our tests were generated with incorrect parameters. - empty children growing to the cross axis size of the container, even when `align-content` is different from `stretch`. This was implemented incorrectly in Chrome as well. Here, we fix it with an extra check. Reviewed By: SidharthGuglani Differential Revision: D14725402 fbshipit-source-id: a45bebdadb9c694dc0eb7e27cb52b3d247f81c50
2019-04-08 03:16:53 -07:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Fix bugs around `align-content` Summary: @public Regenerating the “golden master” tests with chrome surfaced different bugs around `align-content`: - a misunderstanding that values in `align-content` only applied *if there is only one line.* In fact, it applies *every time* a container is set to `flex-wrap: wrap`. Chrome had this wrong, and as such our tests were generated with incorrect parameters. - empty children growing to the cross axis size of the container, even when `align-content` is different from `stretch`. This was implemented incorrectly in Chrome as well. Here, we fix it with an extra check. Reviewed By: SidharthGuglani Differential Revision: D14725402 fbshipit-source-id: a45bebdadb9c694dc0eb7e27cb52b3d247f81c50
2019-04-08 03:16:53 -07:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(150f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Fix bugs around `align-content` Summary: @public Regenerating the “golden master” tests with chrome surfaced different bugs around `align-content`: - a misunderstanding that values in `align-content` only applied *if there is only one line.* In fact, it applies *every time* a container is set to `flex-wrap: wrap`. Chrome had this wrong, and as such our tests were generated with incorrect parameters. - empty children growing to the cross axis size of the container, even when `align-content` is different from `stretch`. This was implemented incorrectly in Chrome as well. Here, we fix it with an extra check. Reviewed By: SidharthGuglani Differential Revision: D14725402 fbshipit-source-id: a45bebdadb9c694dc0eb7e27cb52b3d247f81c50
2019-04-08 03:16:53 -07:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Fix bugs around `align-content` Summary: @public Regenerating the “golden master” tests with chrome surfaced different bugs around `align-content`: - a misunderstanding that values in `align-content` only applied *if there is only one line.* In fact, it applies *every time* a container is set to `flex-wrap: wrap`. Chrome had this wrong, and as such our tests were generated with incorrect parameters. - empty children growing to the cross axis size of the container, even when `align-content` is different from `stretch`. This was implemented incorrectly in Chrome as well. Here, we fix it with an extra check. Reviewed By: SidharthGuglani Differential Revision: D14725402 fbshipit-source-id: a45bebdadb9c694dc0eb7e27cb52b3d247f81c50
2019-04-08 03:16:53 -07:00
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Fix align-content strech with multiple lines Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4551234 fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
2017-02-14 09:16:59 -08:00
}
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_reverse_row_align_content_flex_start()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.WrapReverse;
root.Width = 100;
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child0.Width = 30;
root_child0.Height = 10;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 30;
root_child1.Height = 20;
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child2.Width = 30;
root_child2.Height = 30;
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child3 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child3.Width = 30;
root_child3.Height = 40;
root.Insert(3, root_child3);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child4 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child4.Width = 30;
root_child4.Height = 50;
root.Insert(4, root_child4);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
}
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_reverse_row_align_content_center()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root.AlignContent = YogaAlign.Center;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.WrapReverse;
root.Width = 100;
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child0.Width = 30;
root_child0.Height = 10;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 30;
root_child1.Height = 20;
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child2.Width = 30;
root_child2.Height = 30;
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child3 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child3.Width = 30;
root_child3.Height = 40;
root.Insert(3, root_child3);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child4 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child4.Width = 30;
root_child4.Height = 50;
root.Insert(4, root_child4);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
}
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_reverse_row_single_line_different_size()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.WrapReverse;
root.Width = 300;
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child0.Width = 30;
root_child0.Height = 10;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 30;
root_child1.Height = 20;
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child2.Width = 30;
root_child2.Height = 30;
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child3 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child3.Width = 30;
root_child3.Height = 40;
root.Insert(3, root_child3);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child4 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child4.Width = 30;
root_child4.Height = 50;
root.Insert(4, root_child4);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(300f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(90f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(120f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(300f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(270f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(240f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(210f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(180f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(150f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
}
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_reverse_row_align_content_stretch()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root.AlignContent = YogaAlign.Stretch;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.WrapReverse;
root.Width = 100;
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child0.Width = 30;
root_child0.Height = 10;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 30;
root_child1.Height = 20;
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child2.Width = 30;
root_child2.Height = 30;
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child3 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child3.Width = 30;
root_child3.Height = 40;
root.Insert(3, root_child3);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child4 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child4.Width = 30;
root_child4.Height = 50;
root.Insert(4, root_child4);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
}
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_reverse_row_align_content_space_around()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root.AlignContent = YogaAlign.SpaceAround;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.WrapReverse;
root.Width = 100;
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child0.Width = 30;
root_child0.Height = 10;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 30;
root_child1.Height = 20;
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child2.Width = 30;
root_child2.Height = 30;
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child3 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child3.Width = 30;
root_child3.Height = 40;
root.Insert(3, root_child3);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child4 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child4.Width = 30;
root_child4.Height = 50;
root.Insert(4, root_child4);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
}
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_reverse_column_fixed_size()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root.AlignItems = YogaAlign.Center;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.WrapReverse;
root.Width = 200;
root.Height = 100;
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child0.Width = 30;
root_child0.Height = 10;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child1.Width = 30;
root_child1.Height = 20;
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child2.Width = 30;
root_child2.Height = 30;
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child3 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child3.Width = 30;
root_child3.Height = 40;
root.Insert(3, root_child3);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child4 = new YogaNode(config);
flex-wrap: wrap-reverse support Summary: I couldn't resist to do this 😄 #394 This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse``` I think we hit a edge case here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct. So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60. ```html <div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse"> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> <div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div> </div> ``` Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4564711 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
2017-02-15 13:35:24 -08:00
root_child4.Width = 30;
root_child4.Height = 50;
root.Insert(4, root_child4);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(170f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(170f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(170f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(170f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(140f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(10f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(20f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child3.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(60f, root_child3.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child3.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child3.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child4.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child4.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child4.LayoutHeight);
}
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
[Test]
public void Test_wrapped_row_within_align_items_center()
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root.AlignItems = YogaAlign.Center;
root.Width = 200;
root.Height = 200;
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root_child0.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root_child0.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root_child0_child0.Width = 150;
root_child0_child0.Height = 80;
root_child0.Insert(0, root_child0_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root_child0_child1.Width = 80;
root_child0_child1.Height = 80;
root_child0.Insert(1, root_child0_child1);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(160f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(150f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(160f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(150f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(120f, root_child0_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutHeight);
}
[Test]
Re-generate wrap tests Summary: Seems someone forgot to run the generation script Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4627337 fbshipit-source-id: 17dd1e1fed938a049ae820a9a4ac913667073d09
2017-03-01 06:18:31 -08:00
public void Test_wrapped_row_within_align_items_flex_start()
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root.AlignItems = YogaAlign.FlexStart;
root.Width = 200;
root.Height = 200;
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root_child0.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root_child0.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root_child0_child0.Width = 150;
root_child0_child0.Height = 80;
root_child0.Insert(0, root_child0_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root_child0_child1.Width = 80;
root_child0_child1.Height = 80;
root_child0.Insert(1, root_child0_child1);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(160f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(150f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(160f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(150f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(120f, root_child0_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutHeight);
}
[Test]
Re-generate wrap tests Summary: Seems someone forgot to run the generation script Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4627337 fbshipit-source-id: 17dd1e1fed938a049ae820a9a4ac913667073d09
2017-03-01 06:18:31 -08:00
public void Test_wrapped_row_within_align_items_flex_end()
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
{
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root.AlignItems = YogaAlign.FlexEnd;
root.Width = 200;
root.Height = 200;
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root_child0.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root_child0.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root_child0_child0.Width = 150;
root_child0_child0.Height = 80;
root_child0.Insert(0, root_child0_child0);
Move configuration to new YGConfig and pass them down to CalculateLayout Summary: Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 . Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config. New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432 Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4611359 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
2017-03-01 09:19:55 -08:00
YogaNode root_child0_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
Fix behaviour of wrapping container within align-items: not stretch Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome. Reviewed By: astreet Differential Revision: D4578614 fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
2017-02-20 07:16:58 -08:00
root_child0_child1.Width = 80;
root_child0_child1.Height = 80;
root_child0.Insert(1, root_child0_child1);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(160f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(150f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(160f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(150f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(120f, root_child0_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0_child1.LayoutHeight);
}
Fix flex-wrap with max constraint Summary: Fixes `flex-wrap` with a max constraint and `justify-content`. Fixes facebook/yoga#514. Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/519 Differential Revision: D4953727 Pulled By: emilsjolander fbshipit-source-id: 32dec48220be1392ea8dac5f34871d407eb8d49b
2017-04-26 11:31:06 -07:00
[Test]
public void Test_wrapped_column_max_height()
{
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
root.JustifyContent = YogaJustify.Center;
root.AlignContent = YogaAlign.Center;
root.AlignItems = YogaAlign.Center;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
root.Width = 700;
root.Height = 500;
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0.Width = 100;
root_child0.Height = 500;
root_child0.MaxHeight = 200;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child1.MarginLeft = 20;
root_child1.MarginTop = 20;
root_child1.MarginRight = 20;
root_child1.MarginBottom = 20;
root_child1.Width = 200;
root_child1.Height = 200;
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child2.Width = 100;
root_child2.Height = 100;
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(700f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(250f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(250f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(420f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(700f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(350f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(300f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(250f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(180f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
}
[Test]
public void Test_wrapped_column_max_height_flex()
{
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
root.JustifyContent = YogaJustify.Center;
root.AlignContent = YogaAlign.Center;
root.AlignItems = YogaAlign.Center;
root.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
root.Width = 700;
root.Height = 500;
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0.FlexGrow = 1;
root_child0.FlexShrink = 1;
root_child0.FlexBasis = 0.Percent();
root_child0.Width = 100;
root_child0.Height = 500;
root_child0.MaxHeight = 200;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
YogaNode root_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child1.FlexGrow = 1;
root_child1.FlexShrink = 1;
root_child1.FlexBasis = 0.Percent();
root_child1.MarginLeft = 20;
root_child1.MarginTop = 20;
root_child1.MarginRight = 20;
root_child1.MarginBottom = 20;
root_child1.Width = 200;
root_child1.Height = 200;
root.Insert(1, root_child1);
YogaNode root_child2 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child2.Width = 100;
root_child2.Height = 100;
root.Insert(2, root_child2);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(700f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(300f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(180f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(250f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(180f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(300f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(400f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(700f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(300f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(180f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(250f, root_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(200f, root_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(180f, root_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(300f, root_child2.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(400f, root_child2.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child2.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(100f, root_child2.LayoutHeight);
}
Include margin when calculating if children overflow Summary: Include margin when calculating if children overflow Reviewed By: passy Differential Revision: D5044471 fbshipit-source-id: e7c1eb694445ffb898bcf375d9deefc558c49f11
2017-05-12 09:03:23 -07:00
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_nodes_with_content_sizing_overflowing_margin()
{
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
root.Width = 500;
root.Height = 500;
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root_child0.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
root_child0.Width = 85;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
YogaNode root_child0_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0.Insert(0, root_child0_child0);
YogaNode root_child0_child0_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0_child0_child0.Width = 40;
root_child0_child0_child0.Height = 40;
root_child0_child0.Insert(0, root_child0_child0_child0);
YogaNode root_child0_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0_child1.MarginRight = 10;
root_child0.Insert(1, root_child0_child1);
YogaNode root_child0_child1_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0_child1_child0.Width = 40;
root_child0_child1_child0.Height = 40;
root_child0_child1.Insert(0, root_child0_child1_child0);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(85f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(415f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(85f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(80f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(45f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(35f, root_child0_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutHeight);
}
Fix typo causing wrapped children to be sized by wrong axis margin Summary: Fixes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/issues/548 Reviewed By: passy Differential Revision: D5044470 fbshipit-source-id: 7d203dd48b258a5fe5c4b3c493099092a1d334db
2017-05-12 09:03:24 -07:00
[Test]
public void Test_wrap_nodes_with_content_sizing_margin_cross()
{
YogaConfig config = new YogaConfig();
YogaNode root = new YogaNode(config);
root.Width = 500;
root.Height = 500;
YogaNode root_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0.FlexDirection = YogaFlexDirection.Row;
root_child0.Wrap = YogaWrap.Wrap;
root_child0.Width = 70;
root.Insert(0, root_child0);
YogaNode root_child0_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0.Insert(0, root_child0_child0);
YogaNode root_child0_child0_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0_child0_child0.Width = 40;
root_child0_child0_child0.Height = 40;
root_child0_child0.Insert(0, root_child0_child0_child0);
YogaNode root_child0_child1 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0_child1.MarginTop = 10;
root_child0.Insert(1, root_child0_child1);
YogaNode root_child0_child1_child0 = new YogaNode(config);
root_child0_child1_child0.Width = 40;
root_child0_child1_child0.Height = 40;
root_child0_child1.Insert(0, root_child0_child1_child0);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.LTR;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(90f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child0_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutHeight);
root.StyleDirection = YogaDirection.RTL;
root.CalculateLayout();
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(500f, root.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(430f, root_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(70f, root_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(90f, root_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child0_child0.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(30f, root_child0_child1.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(50f, root_child0_child1.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1.LayoutHeight);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutX);
Assert.AreEqual(0f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutY);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutWidth);
Assert.AreEqual(40f, root_child0_child1_child0.LayoutHeight);
}
Add generated tests Summary: - Add Java and C# test code generated by gentest Reviewed By: emilsjolander Differential Revision: D4065904 fbshipit-source-id: c0d489f37ee0a3132185636812057dc95725d59a
2016-10-23 10:27:32 -07:00
}
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink