Summary:
I couldn't resist to do this 😄#394
This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse```
I think we hit a edge case here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width
as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct.
So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60.
```html
<div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse">
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
</div>
```
Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4564711
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
Summary:
...to reflect the modern world we live in with dynamic DPI platforms :)
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/375
Reviewed By: dshahidehpour
Differential Revision: D4528518
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: e422bd4ae148e02c598a7b484a6adfa8c0e1e0c9
Summary:
Even so I know there are some opinions against ```margin: 0 auto``` it's still part of the spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-flexbox-1/#auto-margins and pretty usefull if you have to position via ```justify-content```.
This PR adds an implementation for that.
It adds an additonal ```YGUnitAuto``` and margins got ```YGNodeStyleSetMarginAuto``` functions as well.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/357
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4501142
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 86519f8632496f46e78a7c9dbc5b21e212e3e0c7
Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4551234
fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
Summary:
Fixes ```align-content:strech``` on nodes without specified cross dimension, if there are multiple lines. Currently it uses the full height of the parent, but it has to use the line height. As we don't know the number of lines until here, we need to realign the relevant children.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/368
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4528559
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 019e6f85fa452d0c3412f711e3886f0c4452da47
Summary:
Adds the two missing alignments ```space-between``` and ```space-around``` for ```align-content``` . Those values are a noop on ```align-items``` in order to prevent a breaking changes for an additional enum.
Fix#229
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/364
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4528561
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: ea6291b6dd22cef05d9eec03893250d50371236e
Summary:
Two bugs:
1. Min/Max width/height should have higher priority than width/height
2. custom measure nodes percentages should be based in parent size like everything else.
Differential Revision: D4537576
fbshipit-source-id: c003f723f424afbca63170d41e54fd5ff837926d
Summary: Test fails when we have flexible child and min/max layout dimension. Yoga should flex the child to minimal size, while in reality Yoga flexes it to maximal size
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4456312
fbshipit-source-id: 82a39bc93cf3bf2374b968e9f7403397e752908e
Summary:
Fix#241 and successor for #302
Added new property ```display``` with ```YGDisplayFlex``` and ```YGDisplayNone```. Allows to hide nodes from the layout without the need to remove it from the DOM.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/369
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4501141
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 0dfeee381f6d1e4bbba81926126b83dd7abab9d6
Summary: If parent size was undefined and node specified percentage size it would pass does an exact measure mode with an undefined value which broke an assertion.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4494265
fbshipit-source-id: 9efef9e39a1b66af2d0f144575a96c919d60dbf7
Summary:
This PR forces the order of the generated enums in alphabetically order. This is needed to have a predictable order of the enums across different python versions. Which reduces the pain for merging multiple enum additions.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/370
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4501140
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 66c0ed9e4ea7a5990578b53b0a7e400c13dd53a9
Summary:
Being a environment test, `npm run is-monolithic` is expected to fail when pulling the package from npm and to succeed when pulling it from github. Unfortunately, when returning false, npm will throw a tantrum by default if not explicitely disabled. It's not a hard failure, the build still complete, but it's better this way.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/362
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4480608
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 0832a2158647f49b5230e2f658997f94774cec5b
Summary: run format & gentest scripts. Some of the javascript tests had not been generated recently by the looks of it.
Reviewed By: dshahidehpour
Differential Revision: D4459455
fbshipit-source-id: fc1eca58fe897c8f4a2571638b4f7035d023b479
Summary:
Fixes issue brought up in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/10603
The gist of the problem is that in css it is fine for a child to overflow a parent if it feels the need to, we were not respecting this.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4182141
fbshipit-source-id: c73fd15d2577ab846fc8a202d529d0e6e1207b75
Summary:
Fix#326. I'll open another PR once this one gets accepted to add support for `YGLayoutGetBorder` 👌
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/335
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4409399
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 8153f6701cab60b55a485f6d2e0b9f7767481090
Summary:
Added baseline support (see #132)
You have the ability for a custom baseline function (```float(*YGBaselineFunc)(YGNodeRef node);```) to return whatever baseline you want.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/317
Reviewed By: splhack
Differential Revision: D4385061
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: cb8a59a09237c840fa3e21753ab68239997dab0c
Summary:
- Fix a few things related to how npm should publish the package (sources were in the gitignore file, so I think it would have break the build during install - I fixed this by adding a npmignore that should override the gitignore rules)
- The enumerations values are now generated directly from `enums.py`
- I added percent unit support (#258) to the bindings (`.setWidthPercent` is currently exposed, but I've also added a very very little parsing to also support `.setWidth("100%")` and `.setWidth(.getWidth())`), added the missing tests, and fixed Travis.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/314
Reviewed By: mikearmstrong001
Differential Revision: D4377198
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 774dfafd416f5421f3be59a1d181eb7056487abe
Summary:
- As mentioned in the title, this PR adds Javascript support to Yoga. Two different builds are included in this PR thanks to [nbind](https://github.com/charto/nbind), which conveniently allow to target both Node.js' native addons and browser environments via asmjs with approximately the same codebase. That should solve #215.
- All tests successfully pass on both codepaths. You can run `yarn test:all` inside the `javascript` directory to test it.
- Because of a bug in nbind, the [following PR](https://github.com/charto/nbind/pull/57) needs to be merged and a new version released before this one can be safely merged as well.
- I had to use `double` types instead of `float` in the C++ bindings because of an Emscripten [bug](https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/issues/3592) where symbols aren't correctly exported when using floats.
- There's some tweaks to do before this PR is 100% ready to merge, but I wanted to have your opinion first. What do you think of this?
---
To do:
- [x] Ensure th
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/304
Reviewed By: mikearmstrong001
Differential Revision: D4375187
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 47248558a9506b7c512b5ef281cd12fe1a60cab7
