Summary: We don't need to set overflow from litho any more because overflow hidden / visible no longer effects layout.
Reviewed By: marco-cova
Differential Revision: D4938759
fbshipit-source-id: 4cd6bc478dd1f56340f23e8bfe95fe7bb1b5db2d
Summary:
See facebook/yoga#483. We should not transfer the layout if the layout didn't change. (using ```hasNewLayout```). This also changes that the lock on the java node is only aquired if needed, and it holds the lock only for the time the values are set and not for the time all it's children are set.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/484
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4802966
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: e8a8f2280ad6b25b98fc68b07eac68e0ec80fe3e
Summary:
As suggested in facebook/yoga#484. This is the PR which only adds the part of using a local bool field for storing the hasLayoutFlag, to be able to pass the layout only if it has really changed.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/492
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4786961
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: cf3d354b93f6dcc3ef817ef73a47bd29e37d1848
Summary:
Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 .
Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config.
New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4611359
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
Summary: Test fails when we have flexible child and min/max layout dimension. Yoga should flex the child to minimal size, while in reality Yoga flexes it to maximal size
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4558653
fbshipit-source-id: 06b38d7ed43aee063cc881f38b84558641f043f3
Summary:
I couldn't resist to do this 😄#394
This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse```
I think we hit a edge case here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width
as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct.
So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60.
```html
<div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse">
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
</div>
```
Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4564711
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
Summary:
...to reflect the modern world we live in with dynamic DPI platforms :)
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/375
Reviewed By: dshahidehpour
Differential Revision: D4528518
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: e422bd4ae148e02c598a7b484a6adfa8c0e1e0c9
Summary:
Even so I know there are some opinions against ```margin: 0 auto``` it's still part of the spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-flexbox-1/#auto-margins and pretty usefull if you have to position via ```justify-content```.
This PR adds an implementation for that.
It adds an additonal ```YGUnitAuto``` and margins got ```YGNodeStyleSetMarginAuto``` functions as well.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/357
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4501142
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 86519f8632496f46e78a7c9dbc5b21e212e3e0c7
Summary:
Adds the two missing alignments ```space-between``` and ```space-around``` for ```align-content``` . Those values are a noop on ```align-items``` in order to prevent a breaking changes for an additional enum.
Fix#229
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/364
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4528561
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: ea6291b6dd22cef05d9eec03893250d50371236e
Summary: Handles nans. Also if the unit is undefined there is no need to check the value.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4531805
fbshipit-source-id: 723e15381e9fa39837a4c99f726501eda26af11b
Summary: This reflects a check to native code where style values will always return the value that was set on them and default to undefined.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4531779
fbshipit-source-id: 97a789e70dcf0fb5174e2039991e7a2b27f45f01
Summary:
Fix#241 and successor for #302
Added new property ```display``` with ```YGDisplayFlex``` and ```YGDisplayNone```. Allows to hide nodes from the layout without the need to remove it from the DOM.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/369
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4501141
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 0dfeee381f6d1e4bbba81926126b83dd7abab9d6
Summary: For percentage paddings/margins/sizes to work on the root node we need to have the ability to pass down the parent sizes. This has always been possible with the C API but was never exposed to java. This diff exposes this functionality.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4501016
fbshipit-source-id: 0c9502e86ff200c021c78afb7ac4b48cf11b3bdb
Summary: values() create a shallow copy of the underlying array every time as there are no immutable arrays in java. By using fromInt() we avoid this allocation.
Reviewed By: pasqualeanatriello
Differential Revision: D4494371
fbshipit-source-id: 11cff65114803e185bc67a96da0bf2a2c4a3e6d9
Summary:
Fix#326. I'll open another PR once this one gets accepted to add support for `YGLayoutGetBorder` 👌
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/335
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4409399
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 8153f6701cab60b55a485f6d2e0b9f7767481090
Summary:
Added baseline support (see #132)
You have the ability for a custom baseline function (```float(*YGBaselineFunc)(YGNodeRef node);```) to return whatever baseline you want.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/317
Reviewed By: splhack
Differential Revision: D4385061
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: cb8a59a09237c840fa3e21753ab68239997dab0c
Summary:
Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit.
You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience.
I did some benchmarks:
```
Without Percentage Feature - Release x86:
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms
With Percentage Feature - Release x86:
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258
Reviewed By: dshahidehpour
Differential Revision: D4361945
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
Summary: Preserve floating point values when passing them across the JNI bridge.
Differential Revision: D4366605
fbshipit-source-id: 0b94ee87a03a6ed918360dd9998930e780fc865d
