Summary:
Fixes the sizing of items so that under most scenarios it calcultes its height by it's content for non exact measurings. This introduces a new useLegacyStretchBehaviour flag on the config to opt out of this change as it is breaking.
See facebook/yoga#505
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/506
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4954016
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: d28bd5d174cd76951fb94df85e3b0cfab7f81ff7
Summary: This diff corrects the fix to be limited only to cases when either element itself or all of it's children can't be flexed
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4915189
fbshipit-source-id: efccee2fe39ed0f474a41dc3250d24c546f3f5d9
Summary:
If a min constraint exists. It incorrectly reduces the available space by that amount. This adds a test and fix for this.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/501
Differential Revision: D4867146
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: ceafe070bfe7f501929d316656ac44c4e1753059
Summary:
The following PR fixes the tests used in the javascript port (it modifies gentest.rb).
These changes don't yet pass, it seems something is segfaulting somewhere. I have to check if it comes from nbind, the yoga library, or the node bridge itself. There's also some fails on the browser build, but it might be the same issue.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/487
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4778870
Pulled By: astreet
fbshipit-source-id: 936fbca564ec89738c78e50c4402c53eb6867dec
Summary:
Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 .
Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config.
New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4611359
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
Summary: Test fails when we have flexible child and min/max layout dimension. Yoga should flex the child to minimal size, while in reality Yoga flexes it to maximal size
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4558653
fbshipit-source-id: 06b38d7ed43aee063cc881f38b84558641f043f3
Summary:
Two bugs:
1. Min/Max width/height should have higher priority than width/height
2. custom measure nodes percentages should be based in parent size like everything else.
Differential Revision: D4537576
fbshipit-source-id: c003f723f424afbca63170d41e54fd5ff837926d
Summary: Test fails when we have flexible child and min/max layout dimension. Yoga should flex the child to minimal size, while in reality Yoga flexes it to maximal size
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4456312
fbshipit-source-id: 82a39bc93cf3bf2374b968e9f7403397e752908e
Summary:
- As mentioned in the title, this PR adds Javascript support to Yoga. Two different builds are included in this PR thanks to [nbind](https://github.com/charto/nbind), which conveniently allow to target both Node.js' native addons and browser environments via asmjs with approximately the same codebase. That should solve #215.
- All tests successfully pass on both codepaths. You can run `yarn test:all` inside the `javascript` directory to test it.
- Because of a bug in nbind, the [following PR](https://github.com/charto/nbind/pull/57) needs to be merged and a new version released before this one can be safely merged as well.
- I had to use `double` types instead of `float` in the C++ bindings because of an Emscripten [bug](https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/issues/3592) where symbols aren't correctly exported when using floats.
- There's some tweaks to do before this PR is 100% ready to merge, but I wanted to have your opinion first. What do you think of this?
---
To do:
- [x] Ensure th
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/304
Reviewed By: mikearmstrong001
Differential Revision: D4375187
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 47248558a9506b7c512b5ef281cd12fe1a60cab7
