Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1497
The lowest common denominator we have had for Yoga has been Clang 12 + MSVC 2017 stdlib. This has allowed Yoga to use C++ 20 language features, but not library features. React Native for mobile has not been bound to this restriction.
Builds using that toolchain are being updated to latest MSVC 2019 stdlib (which has good C++ 20 library support), along with Clang 17 (or maybe a stop at 15) pending projects using `-fcoroutines-ts` being migrated to C++ 20.
This tests out some C++ 20 standard library usages against the current Clang 12 + MSVC 2019 stdlib toolchain that didn't work before, and adds a couple concepts for better constraints/compiler error messages if misused.
This bumps min-tested XCode (and minimum required) version to 14.3, matching a similar change for React Native. This should probably be bumped to 15 sometime before Apple starts requiring 15+ to go out to the iOS app store.
We are approaching a practical support range of:
1. XCode >= 14.3
2. NDK >= 26
3. Clang/libc++ >= 14
4. GCC/libstdc++ >= 11
5. MSVC >= 16.11 (VS 2019)
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: cortinico
Differential Revision: D51604487
fbshipit-source-id: d394d0d86672b69781b8ae071d87adcf944ddc72
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1510
Make each workflow acquire a shared mutex so that if two commits happen close to each other, the publish order must correspond to commit order.
Reviewed By: cortinico
Differential Revision: D52031970
fbshipit-source-id: 960cd8e8f79b26ab3d9c131e0637b795618d898e
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1488
These were disabled when they were written because they were broken. The recent changes made them pass now so lets enable them. I also added another test that is already passing
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51404875
fbshipit-source-id: ed10004968b871c1d033640d75138f00afc15968
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1490
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41692
In the previous diffs I fixed problems with justifying absolute nodes. The same issues plague aligning so I fixed them in the same way. Added tests that were failing before but now passing
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51404489
fbshipit-source-id: 604495d651eb67cfdcca40df9d8d3a125c5741a8
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1487
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41691
The code here was just wrong. I changed it to be the same logic as the Justify:FlexStart case, but with the flex end sides. Then I get the position for the opposite edge since we need to write to flex start side.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51383792
fbshipit-source-id: 372835a44edff361dbd84dd92ff9f2ec844b9f9c
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1489
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41690
Centering involves centering the margin box in the content box of the parent, and then getting the distance from the flex start edge of the parent to the child
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51383625
fbshipit-source-id: 6bbbace95689ef39c35303bea4b99505952df457
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1483
This test is for ensuring caching does not break layout when a CB changes. No changes were needed to get this passing it just works this way with the implementation we chose earlier.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51333812
fbshipit-source-id: b3b603fc641d470cb61e63c44c71f7544f3c7727
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1485
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41686
The size of the containing block is the size of the padding box of the containing node for absolute nodes. We were looking at `containingNode->getLayout().measuredDimension(Dimension::Width)` which is the border box. So we need to subtract the border from this.
Added a test that was failing before this change as well
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51330526
fbshipit-source-id: adc448dfb71b54f1bbed0d9d61c5553bda4b106c
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1482
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41685
This is the final step (that I know of) to get the core features of static working. Here we turn on all of the tests and pass down the correct owner size for the call to `calculateLayoutInternal` that is in `layoutAbsoluteChild`
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51293606
fbshipit-source-id: 972259e7ebecb19b55aef2ef866bd7cb57aaf0ca
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1481
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41684
Absolute nodes can be laid out by themselves and do not have to care about what is happening to their siblings. Because of this we can make `positionAbsoluteChild` the sole place where we handle this logic. Right now that is scattered around algorithm with many `if (child is absolute)` cases everywhere. This makes implementing position static a lot harder since we are relying on the CB to do all this work, not the parent.
With this change the only time we set position for an absolute node and it matter (i.e. not overwritten) is in `positionAbsoluteChild`
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51290723
fbshipit-source-id: 405d81b1d28826cbb0323dc117c406a44d381dff
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1496
Gentest code has a problem where we try to apply a border in our test when the web browser is not actually adding one. This happens when we do something like `border-top: 10px`. This will actually set the style of the border to `initial` which is just `none`, so nothing renders. This is causing at least 1 test to pass when it actually fails.
I changed it so we ignore setting this value if the style is one of these values. I then re-ran the gentest code and excluded the now failing test (which gets fixed in my static stack).
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51831754
fbshipit-source-id: a325e4a42b2d7cd6f19efc6cd5a2445574467fb7
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1494
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41788
Those tests are currently disabled due to Yoga attempting to do JNI calls.
I've added infra to bypass .so loading during tests, and we should be good to re-enable those tests by now.
Changelog:
[Internal] [Changed] - Re-enabled disabled tests ReactPropForShadowNodeSpecTest and ReactPropForShadowNodeSetterTest
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51814491
fbshipit-source-id: adbbace19c94a0c6d8947f61221fafafd7797ac8
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1495
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41794
This is a copy of D51369722 to make it so that it preserves the file history
CalculateLayout.cpp is massive and approaching 3k lines. I added a few large functions dealing with layout of absolute nodes and was thinking it would be nice if that logic was just in its own file so it was more isolated and easier to reason about. So I made AbsoluteLayout.cpp and AbsoluteLayout.h to house this logic. In order for this to work I had to expose calculateLayoutInternal in CalculateLayout.h as layoutAbsoluteChild calls it. This is unideal and I would like to find a better way...
I also make LayoutUtils.h to house misc small helper methods as they are called in AbsoluteLayout.cpp and CalculateLayout.cpp
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51824115
fbshipit-source-id: 9b27449e3c1516492c01e6167a6b2c4568a33807
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1479
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41682
There are two ways to get the value of a style for a specific edge right now:
1) From the inline start/end edge which is determined via the writing direction (ltr or rtl), assuming you do not have errata on
2) From the flex start/end edge which is determined via the flex direction (row, row-reverse, column, column-reverse)
There is a weird curiosity in the second case: you can define a style to be on the "start" or "end" edge when writing the stylex/css. The physical edge that this refers to is dependent on the writing direction. So `start` would be `left` in `ltr` and `right` in `rtl`, with `end` the opposite. It is **never** determined via the flex direction. Additionally, `start`/`end` takes precedence over the physical edge it corresponds to in the case both are defined.
So, all of this means that to actually get the value of a style from the flex start/end edges, we need to account for the case that one of these relative edges was defined and would overwrite any physical edge. Since this mapping is solely determined by the writing direction, we need to pass that in to all the flex start/end getters and do that logic. This is done in `flexStartRelativeEdge`/`flexEndRelativeEdge` which was added earlier but for some reason only being used on border.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51293315
fbshipit-source-id: 26fafff54827134e7c5b10354ff9bfdf67096f5b
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1473
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41491
To simplify the logic a bit I introduce a new function called `positionAbsoluteChild`. This function will, eventually, be the **sole function that matters** when determining the layout position of an absolute node. Because [absolute nodes do not participate in flex layout](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox/#abspos-items), we can determine the position of said node independently of its siblings. The only information we need are the node itself, its parent, and its containing block - which we have all of in `layoutAbsoluteChild`.
Right now, however, this is purely a BE change with no functionality different. There was a big set of if statements at the end of `layoutAbsoluteChild` that would position the node on the main and cross axis for certain cases. The old code had it so that the main and cross axis had basically the same logic but the code was repeated. This puts that logic, as is, in `positionAbsoluteChild` and calls that from `layoutAbsoluteChild`.
I will soon edit this function to actually do what it is envisioned to do (i.e. be the sole place that position is set for absolute nodes).
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51272855
fbshipit-source-id: 68fa1f0e0f4d595faf2af1d9eaceb467382ca406
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41490
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1472
This change has most of the logic needed for supporting `position: static`. We do two things here that fix a lot of the broken static test:
1) We pass in the containing node to `layoutAbsoluteChild` and use it to properly position the child in the case that insets are defined.
2) We rewrite the absolute child's position to be relative to it's parent in the event that insets are defined for that child (and thus it is positioned relative to its CB). Yoga's layout position has always be relative to parent, so I feel it is easier to just adjust the coordinates of a node to adhere to that design rather than change the consumers of yoga.
The "hard" part of this algorithm is determining how to iterate the offset from the containing block needed to do this translation described above. That is handled in `layoutAbsoluteDescendants`.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51224327
fbshipit-source-id: ae6dc54fe2a71bebb4090ba21a0afb0125264cbc
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41489
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1471
If we are going to allow the containing block to layout its absolute descendants and NOT the direct parent then we need to change step 11 which is concerned with setting the trailing position in the case we are row or column reverse. This is the very last step in the function and is positioned that way because it operates on the assumption that all children have their position set by this time. That is no longer a valid assumption if CBs layout their absolute children. In that case the CB also needs to take care of setting the position here.
Because of this problem I moved some things around. It now works like:
* If errata is set, the direct parent will set trailing position for all non absolute children in step 11
* If errata is set the CB will set trailing position of absolute descendants after they are laid out inside of layoutAbsoluteDescendants
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51217291
fbshipit-source-id: a7eea0d3623f9041b73d609a1de2bfb0f0343a26
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41488
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1470
The way we plan on implementing `position: static` is by changing how we lay out absolutely positioned nodes. Instead of letting their direct parent lay them out we are going to let their containing block handle it. This is useful because by the time the containing block gets to this step it will already know its size, which is needed to ensure that absolute nodes can get the right value with percentage units. Additionally, it means that we can "translate" the position of the absolute nodes to be relative to their parent fairly easily, instead of some second pass that would not be possible with a different design.
This change just gets the core pieces of this process going. It makes it so that containing blocks will layout out absolute descendants that they contain. We also pass in the containing block size to the owner size args for `layoutAbsoluteChild`. This new path will only happen if we have the errata turned off. If there is no positioned ancestor for a given node we just assume the root is. This is not exactly how it works on the web - there is a notion of an initial containing block - but we are not implementing that as of right now.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51182593
fbshipit-source-id: 88b5730f7f4fec4f33ec64288618e23363091857
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41480
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1469
The previous version of static didn't do anything inside of Yoga. Now that we're making it do something, this changes the default back to relative so that users with no errata set don't see their deafult styles changing.
Reviewed By: joevilches
Differential Revision: D51182955
fbshipit-source-id: c0ea357694e1367fb6786f1907dfff784b19a4bc
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41394
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1463
Now that are enums are unsigned, and we don't have BitfieldRef, we can convert the last remaining user of NumericBitfield to a plain old bitfield, for better readability (e.g. the default values), debugability, and less complexity. We also break a cycle which lets us properly group public vs private members.
Reviewed By: joevilches
Differential Revision: D51159415
fbshipit-source-id: 7842a8330eed6061b863de3f175c761dcf4aa2be
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41391
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1461
Converts usages of `YGEdge` within internal APIs to `yoga::Edge` scoped enum.
With the exception of YGUnit which is in its own state of transition, this is the last public yoga enum to need to be moved to scoped enum form for usages internal to the Yoga public API.
Changelog: [internal]
Reviewed By: rshest
Differential Revision: D51152779
fbshipit-source-id: 06554f67bfd7709cbc24fdd9a5474e897e9e95d8
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41390
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1460
Yoga passes `MeasureMode`/`YGMeasureMode` to express constraints in how a box should be measured, given definite or indefinite available space.
This is modeled after Android [MeasureSpec](https://developer.android.com/reference/android/view/View.MeasureSpec), with a table above `calculateLayoutImpl()` explaining the CSS terms they map to. This can be confusing when flipping between the spec, and code.
This switches internal usages to the CSS terms, but leaves around `YGMeasureMode` since it is the public API passed to measure functions.
Reviewed By: joevilches
Differential Revision: D51068417
fbshipit-source-id: 0a76266a4e7e0cc39996164607229c3c41de2818
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41392
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1458
We're moving `CompactValue` to be an internal detail of `yoga::Style`, where users outside of the style will be dealing with a resolved/non-compact representation.
This change renames usages of `CompactValue` to `Style::Length`, which will be Yoga's representation for CSS input lengths. Right now one is just a type alias of the other, but this will let us change the internals of CompactValue with the rest of the world looking the same.
A few factory functions are added to `yoga::value` for creating CSS values. There are some shenanigans around how we want to represent CSS pixels (one YGUnitPoint), when we also end up adding CSS points (slightly larger than one YGUnitPoint). For now, I reused `point` until making other changes.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D51000389
fbshipit-source-id: 00f55e72bfb8aa291b53308f8a62ac8797be490f
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1476
Up the stack, Style uses just plain getters and setters. These tests aren't particularly useful enough to update.
Previously landed as part of D50998164
Reviewed By: joevilches
Differential Revision: D51481328
fbshipit-source-id: b0413270fd5951c7c8d783269b08cca9f939ce25
Summary:
Bitfield enums are not sequential, so use of these functions on these enums would be invalid.
I looked at whether we could trivially move `bitCount` to template based on `ordinalCount`. `bitCount` must be constexpr, since we use it directly as a bit-field size constant. `log2` and `ceil` to be constexpr, which isn't here until C++ 26.
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D51518899
fbshipit-source-id: 256f15bbed517be6f90bf43baa43ce96e9259a71
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1475
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41568
Removes cases where we rely on comparing composite of Yoga edges, since we are removing that internal API (public API is already one at a time). Extracted from D50998164, with more sound facility for looping through edges.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D51478403
fbshipit-source-id: 162170b91345ff86db44a49a04a2345f0fbd0911
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41347
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1453
This follows the previous patterns used for `Gutters` and `Dimension`, where we hide CompactValue array implementation from `yoga::Style` callers.
This allows a single read of a style to only need access to the resolved values of a single edge, vs all edges. This is cheap now because the interface is the representation, but gets expensive if `StyleValuePool` is the actual implementation.
This prevents us from needing to resolve nine dimensions, in order to read a single value like `marginLeft`. Doing this, in the new style, also lets us remove `IdxRef` from the API.
We unroll the structure dependent parts in the props parsing code, for something more verbose, but also a bit clearer.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: joevilches
Differential Revision: D50998164
fbshipit-source-id: 248396f9587e29d62cde05ae7512d8194f60c809
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41423
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1466
Right now Yoga's main branch says it's 2.0.0, and RN's dirsync says its 1.14.0, but the code is really closer to what will be Yoga 3.0.0.
This changes trunk builds to "0.0.0" for clarity, which will be assigned a real version number the first time publishing a new Yoga branch.
This is separately a good practice to prevent the chance of accidental publishes causing damage.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: christophpurrer
Differential Revision: D51236778
fbshipit-source-id: 06cac89bcca1c707ce5c00f9c346f627eef6b4bc
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1467
1. Avoid reusing workflow names between validation and publish jobs, since they show up with the same UI when wanting to adhoc trigger a publish.
2. Merge SwiftPM checks into Validate Apple job
3. Merge remnants of website-next workflow into website workflow (and remove a redundant explicit build step already removed in one workflow)
4. Run more validation on push to release branch
5. Do not run website validation off of main, since it is only ever deployed from main branch
Reviewed By: cipolleschi
Differential Revision: D51236885
fbshipit-source-id: dd8165aa9871f173d8914f345569c6cde1edda72
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41420
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1465https://yogalayout.com now redirects to https://yogalayout.dev
This replaces references to "yogalayout.com" with "yogalayout.dev", the same website, with a new domain. This includes:
1. Code comments
2. Yoga website config (publish action CNAME, Docusaurus config)
3. Documentation URLs in Yoga packages
Changelog:
[General][Fixed] - "yogalayout.com" to "yogalayout.dev"
Reviewed By: christophpurrer
Differential Revision: D51229587
fbshipit-source-id: b1c336a52aab5e02565071b61430d5435381dc0a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1451
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41327
The special meaning of `0.0` is now explained in the function header, and we aren't doing any sort of insensitive compare here, so the code after should be equivalent and a bit simpler.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D51014264
fbshipit-source-id: 60f4a2df039f74089d5c7fabd4b7d8ac6234ba72
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41317
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1449
This aims to clean up the public Yoga C API, by:
1. Documenting public YGNode, YGValue, YGConfig APIs
2. Splitting APIs for specific objects into different header files (because Yoga.h was big enough without documentation)
3. Reordering headers and definitions for consistent grouping
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: joevilches
Differential Revision: D50963424
fbshipit-source-id: 45124b7370256fc63aefd6d5b7641466e9a79d3b
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41346
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1452
This removes the last remnant from `Yoga-interna.h`, `YGNodeDellocate()`. The API is renamed to `YGNodeFinalize` to give it the explicit purpose of freeing the node from a garbage collector, and made public with that documented contract.
With that, every top-level header is now a public API, and Yoga's JNI bindings do not need to rely on private headers anymore.
Changelog: [Internal]
Reviewed By: joevilches
Differential Revision: D51014340
fbshipit-source-id: 553f04b62c78b76f9102cd6197146650955aeec5
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41305
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1448
This should not be part of Yoga's API. If benchmarks want to do this, they still can (though I don't know the ones we have for it are super valuable).
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D50963933
fbshipit-source-id: 6482bd269928188b6469a358ffde5c4f9f5f9527
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41293
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1446
NickGerleman pointed out that my recent changes to fix the slew of row-reverse problems in Yoga actually ended up regressing some parts. Specifically, absolute children of row-reverse containers would have their insets set to the wrong side. So if you set left: 10 it would apply it to the right.
Turns out, in `layoutAbsoluteChild` there were cases where we were applying inlineStart/End values to the flexStart/End edge, which can never be right. So I changed the values to also be flexStart/End as the fix here.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D50945475
fbshipit-source-id: 290de06dcc04e8e644a3a32c127af12fdabb2f75
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41209
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1439
There are so many instances in this code base where we use the double negative of `!yoga::isUndefined(<something>)`. This is not as easy to read since because of this double negative imo. Additionally, sometimes we have really long chains like `!longVariableName.longFunctionName(longArgumentName).isUndefined()` and it is hard to see that this undefined is inverted.
This just replaces all instances of inverted `isUndefined()` with `isDefined()` so its easier to read.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D50705523
fbshipit-source-id: edc7d3f2cbbae38ddaeb2030a419320caf73feff
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1437
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41208
Reading through the sizing logic and this seemed a bit redundant/confusing. Lets use the same function we just used for the main axis for the cross axis as well so people do not think its special. Also we will need one less variable. The reason this was done it seems is because we need the leading padding + border elsewhere so this is technically a few less steps but this is cleaner
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D50704177
fbshipit-source-id: 1a091edbfee6482a2bf472aca2980702bd75ad94
Summary:
`child.offsetLeft/Top` calculates the offset from child to its nearest positioned ancestor, not its direct parent. These are often the same and have not mattered in the past since we have not supported position static. Since are are in the process of supporting that, we would like our tests to be usable so this adjusts the gentest methodology to only speak the same language as Yoga - that is left/top are always relative to direct parents.
It works by using `getBoundingClientRect().left/top` instead. Then we pass that down to children and subtract it from the childs `getBoundingClientRect()` to get the position relative to the parent. Note we have to round the final result as `child.offsetLeft/Top` is rounded.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D51053629
fbshipit-source-id: 8809588d12953565228ae50fdf38197213c46182
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1447
Just ran
```
ruby xplat/yoga/gentest/gentest.rb
```
It seems that D50453324 changed a bunch of the import directories in these test files but for some reason it did not get picked up for this test. As a result we are seeing failing github checks like https://github.com/facebook/yoga/actions/runs/6738747977/job/18318958442. Should be good now.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D50951161
fbshipit-source-id: a2472022782f64f840a64ed991f5f35c3ef556dc
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/issues/1417
This dramatically simplifies the matrix of Node vs web, ASM vs WASM, sync vs async compilation, or CommonJS vs ES Modules. We have one variant, using wasm, with ESModule top-level await to do async compilation. Web/node share the same binary, and we base64 encode the WASM into a wrapper JS file for compatibility with Node and bundlers.
This has some downsides, like requiring an environment with top level await, but also has upsides, like a consistent, sync looking API compatible with older Yoga, and mitigating TypeScript issues with package exports and typings resolution.
As part of this work I also removed `ts-node` from the toolchain (at the cost of a couple of config files needing to be vanilla JS).
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1433
Test Plan:
1. `yarn test`
2. `yarn lint`
3. `yarn tsc`
4. `yarn benchmark`
5. `yarn build` website-next
6. `yarn lint` website-next
7. Locally test website-next
8. Examine package artifact created by GitHub
9. All Automation passes
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D50453324
Pulled By: NickGerleman
fbshipit-source-id: fe1192acc69e57fa69a1ff056dd7b5844d2198d5
