Summary: Some of the tests were not generated correctly. most likely due to a rebase.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4637539
fbshipit-source-id: 196478d7e5197519af9ab05e5134e6fb7d22b992
Summary:
Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 .
Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config.
New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4611359
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
Summary: Test fails when we have flexible child and min/max layout dimension. Yoga should flex the child to minimal size, while in reality Yoga flexes it to maximal size
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4558653
fbshipit-source-id: 06b38d7ed43aee063cc881f38b84558641f043f3
Summary:
Changed the flex getters to return the values they were actually set. See #421 .
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/431
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4604744
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 02d79100ef22be866db1c3bd9d53e4447186811f
Summary: The size of the node is already set on the node however there was no way to set the size of the parent to the root so that the root could use percentages. This change fixes this by making the width and height passed to calculate layout be the width and height of the hypothetical parent.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4611417
fbshipit-source-id: 2fb0eedffa17f0ec89b601722a1717a72e216b9e
Summary: This diff adds rounding to the pixel grid feature to Yoga and appropriate property
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4565980
fbshipit-source-id: 9700f6d6ed147f82b19f230fbff2e9ccbd625b25
Summary:
Fix for #413. This was a hangover from a previous attept to fix other align-content problems.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/417
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4604727
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 92fd31a385d8182c6b201c891d5ae478372d525d
Summary: When a container's children wrap the container should match the parent size and not wrap to the new size of the children. This is confirmed behavior in chrome.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4578614
fbshipit-source-id: 5d22a3a673735587384d775189158a87bb1d457d
Summary:
I couldn't resist to do this 😄#394
This adds ```flex-wrap: wrap-reverse```
I think we hit a edge case here:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33891709/when-flexbox-items-wrap-in-column-mode-container-does-not-grow-its-width
as is differs here from chrome, but I think that yoga is here more correct.
So I haven't added this test yet as this would fail against chrome, as chrome outputs a width of 30 for root, whereas yoga gets a width of 60 here, which I think is correct. Strangely the output of ```flex-wrap:wrap``` is in jsfiddle also only with a (visual) width of 30 on chrome, while the tests gets generated with 60.
```html
<div id="wrap_reverse_column" style="height: 100px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse">
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
<div style="height: 30px; width: 30px;"></div>
</div>
```
Looking forward what you think here emilsjolander
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/398
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4564711
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 33dc055abd8444b2aa7796ef90bd7ec99e961bb8
Summary:
Even so I know there are some opinions against ```margin: 0 auto``` it's still part of the spec: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-flexbox-1/#auto-margins and pretty usefull if you have to position via ```justify-content```.
This PR adds an implementation for that.
It adds an additonal ```YGUnitAuto``` and margins got ```YGNodeStyleSetMarginAuto``` functions as well.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/357
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4501142
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 86519f8632496f46e78a7c9dbc5b21e212e3e0c7
Summary: This is an update of facebook/yoga#368 which was reverted. It fixes support for align-content: strech with multiple lines. The problem with the last attempt at solving this was that align-items:stretch was interfering. We handle this now by detecting when the flex basis of the children hints at them overflowing. This is not 100% correct as the size of the items could change when remeasuring but it will work in 99% of cases.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4551234
fbshipit-source-id: 2964f19cf415991dc55dfa2caa4868cb00c56bd0
Summary:
Fixes ```align-content:strech``` on nodes without specified cross dimension, if there are multiple lines. Currently it uses the full height of the parent, but it has to use the line height. As we don't know the number of lines until here, we need to realign the relevant children.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/368
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4528559
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 019e6f85fa452d0c3412f711e3886f0c4452da47
Summary:
Due to the changes in 46817a38. We have a bug if the layout changes.
This PR fixes this bug and adds a test for it.
Additionally it correctly marks negative percentage values as undefined dim.
It also changes the ```resolvedDimensions``` to use a reference instead of the full value in order to minimize the memory requirement of a ```YGNode``` and reduces the copying of the ```YGValue```.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/379
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4528552
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: c024fe3a009c3788af319b689858ea3374c46477
Summary:
Adds the two missing alignments ```space-between``` and ```space-around``` for ```align-content``` . Those values are a noop on ```align-items``` in order to prevent a breaking changes for an additional enum.
Fix#229
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/364
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4528561
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: ea6291b6dd22cef05d9eec03893250d50371236e
Summary:
Two bugs:
1. Min/Max width/height should have higher priority than width/height
2. custom measure nodes percentages should be based in parent size like everything else.
Differential Revision: D4537576
fbshipit-source-id: c003f723f424afbca63170d41e54fd5ff837926d
Summary: If a node has minDimension and maxDimension set at the same value, yoga will treat it as having a set dimension, doing less calculations.
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4492395
fbshipit-source-id: 3f4293548399e006aa808b9586d24e77c7df1f21
Summary: Test fails when we have flexible child and min/max layout dimension. Yoga should flex the child to minimal size, while in reality Yoga flexes it to maximal size
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4456312
fbshipit-source-id: 82a39bc93cf3bf2374b968e9f7403397e752908e
Summary:
Fix#241 and successor for #302
Added new property ```display``` with ```YGDisplayFlex``` and ```YGDisplayNone```. Allows to hide nodes from the layout without the need to remove it from the DOM.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/369
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4501141
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 0dfeee381f6d1e4bbba81926126b83dd7abab9d6
Summary: Previously we needed to be able to return a computed value from the style edge getters to correctly handle things like RTL in frameworks such as React Native. However we now have a more correct solution with is to expose layout outputs for these edge values. This means we can go back to returning the raw value set for padding/margin/border like we do with other styles.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4500892
fbshipit-source-id: e7c26bdda9ecbfc76b6cf1f384f8cf9f38284120
Summary: If parent size was undefined and node specified percentage size it would pass does an exact measure mode with an undefined value which broke an assertion.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4494265
fbshipit-source-id: 9efef9e39a1b66af2d0f144575a96c919d60dbf7
Summary: aspect ratio did not account for the widths and heights being including padding. This diff fixes that.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4473024
fbshipit-source-id: 5a747e2f267b077203bb3b63e4c152847dc30774
Summary: Absolute children should not be constraint to the size of their parent if the parent does not have a size as this was causes the layout of the child to be skipped.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4453612
fbshipit-source-id: e8269521560d2f42b2d6f0f0ff264a1605a57d79
Summary:
Fixes issue brought up in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/10603
The gist of the problem is that in css it is fine for a child to overflow a parent if it feels the need to, we were not respecting this.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4182141
fbshipit-source-id: c73fd15d2577ab846fc8a202d529d0e6e1207b75
Summary:
Fix#326. I'll open another PR once this one gets accepted to add support for `YGLayoutGetBorder` 👌
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/335
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4409399
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 8153f6701cab60b55a485f6d2e0b9f7767481090
Summary: Allow aspect ratio to expand beyond bounds of parent as is generally accepted in css
Reviewed By: passy
Differential Revision: D4397547
fbshipit-source-id: d2b1ca7b096f2f17b3efbd8f47a50678bfe7bb5f
Summary:
Added baseline support (see #132)
You have the ability for a custom baseline function (```float(*YGBaselineFunc)(YGNodeRef node);```) to return whatever baseline you want.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/317
Reviewed By: splhack
Differential Revision: D4385061
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: cb8a59a09237c840fa3e21753ab68239997dab0c
Summary: Add API for retrieving the computed final padding of a node. Many frameworks such as React Native retrieve padding via `YGNodeStyleGetPadding` but given that we now support percentage values this is not correct anymore.
Differential Revision: D4376572
fbshipit-source-id: 3ffb66e77090fc1257511bec5c933f9b0c304b9f
Summary:
Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit.
You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience.
I did some benchmarks:
```
Without Percentage Feature - Release x86:
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms
With Percentage Feature - Release x86:
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258
Reviewed By: dshahidehpour
Differential Revision: D4361945
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
Summary: Improve performance of allocations and reseting by writing fewer bits. Also just looks nicer imho.
Reviewed By: passy
Differential Revision: D4356994
fbshipit-source-id: ebbe52163e0c86230bfa4131b657941afe16fbf1
Summary:
@public
AspectRatio is a new addition and soon after introduction we noticed use cases which is did not support. Specifically we wanted to support a node being as large as possible within a container while maintaining an arbitrary aspect ratio. This was not possible due to the low priority of AspectRatio, by increasing the priority of AspectRatio this is now possible as FlexGrow will grow an item to fit its parent unless the AspectRatio makes it too big in the cross axis, the AspectRatio will now override the FlexGrow in the main axis in that case.
Differential Revision: D4346720
fbshipit-source-id: 1f15613604190e3ad5ff4a467ba57db4bcfd2741
Summary:
@public
Aspect ratio being defined as width/height or height/width depending on the situation it was used in turned out to be very confusing. This diff makes aspect ratio always be defined as width/height irregardless of the usage.
Differential Revision: D4339132
fbshipit-source-id: e5da32750b55ddaf6acaf1cbd7662d86f2b480c3
Summary: This test creates a repro case for Yoga to emulate UFI layout failure
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4313632
fbshipit-source-id: 35be7d86b50a9ae08c81891a889a74e4b61f2d27
Summary: I kept wrongly typing this function which is a good sign that the name is inconsistent.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4333480
fbshipit-source-id: 17058f18fa9e26b3e02f7a1651f7295cae59acad
Summary: Rename test files to use new name
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4265235
fbshipit-source-id: 0090d3949828058baf7435f33d4068de92756bad
Summary: This renames the core C api to use the new Yoga branding.
Differential Revision: D4259190
fbshipit-source-id: 26c8b356ca464d4304f5f9dc4192bff10cea2dc9
