Summary: If parent size was undefined and node specified percentage size it would pass does an exact measure mode with an undefined value which broke an assertion.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4494265
fbshipit-source-id: 9efef9e39a1b66af2d0f144575a96c919d60dbf7
Summary:
Fixes issue brought up in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/10603
The gist of the problem is that in css it is fine for a child to overflow a parent if it feels the need to, we were not respecting this.
Reviewed By: mmmulani
Differential Revision: D4182141
fbshipit-source-id: c73fd15d2577ab846fc8a202d529d0e6e1207b75
Summary:
Added baseline support (see #132)
You have the ability for a custom baseline function (```float(*YGBaselineFunc)(YGNodeRef node);```) to return whatever baseline you want.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/317
Reviewed By: splhack
Differential Revision: D4385061
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: cb8a59a09237c840fa3e21753ab68239997dab0c
Summary:
Adds the feature to use percentage as a value unit.
You can use the function ```YGPx(float)``` and ```YGPercent(float)``` for convenience.
I did some benchmarks:
```
Without Percentage Feature - Release x86:
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.146683 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.490101 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 23.000000 ms, stddev: 0.928291 ms
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.170587 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.143384 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.477791 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 22.000000 ms, stddev: 2.129779 ms
With Percentage Feature - Release x86:
Stack with flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.132951 ms
Align stretch in undefined axis: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.136525 ms
Nested flex: median: 0.000000 ms, stddev: 0.489570 ms
Huge nested layout: median: 21.000000 ms, stddev: 1.390476 ms
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/258
Reviewed By: dshahidehpour
Differential Revision: D4361945
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: a8f5bc63ad352eb9410d792729e56664468cd76a
Summary: This test creates a repro case for Yoga to emulate UFI layout failure
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4313632
fbshipit-source-id: 35be7d86b50a9ae08c81891a889a74e4b61f2d27
Summary: Rename test files to use new name
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4265235
fbshipit-source-id: 0090d3949828058baf7435f33d4068de92756bad
Summary:
This diff does two things
- Clean up some of the generated code making the files smaller.
- Add experiment support to generated tests allowing us to use gentest for things still being experimented with such as more compliant flex-basis behavior.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4226734
fbshipit-source-id: 2cc1471c21883e8e326f16e7a8bb1a3657acd84b
Summary:
Fixes issue brought up in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/issues/10603
The gist of the problem is that in css it is fine for a child to overflow a parent if it feels the need to, we were not respecting this.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4157971
fbshipit-source-id: 3cfae15ac8b65b70f01789444099ee684e1b099a
Summary: Previous fix for flex in max size constraint was not entirely correct and was missing a test case for the time when the max constraint is not applied. This diff addresses that.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4162104
fbshipit-source-id: 08feba6cb4e789c9aa12179e2cdeadc66b011841
Summary:
If there is a single child which is flex grow and flex shrink then instead of measuring and then shrinking we can just set the flex basis to zero as we know the final result will be that the child take up all remaining space.
This is a re-land of D4147298. I have updated the diff to check explicitly for exact measure mode to also handle at_most case correctly.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4153133
fbshipit-source-id: 2333150a83857cc30078cc8d52761cbd00652830
Summary: Default value for positions should be undefined not 0px. Fixing this leads to more correct tests.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4153329
fbshipit-source-id: d0f194f9c47eac93d3815ec7e55568a1016bc7fe
Summary:
Max dimension constraints were not correctly passed down to children.
see https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/issues/230 for more info
fixes#230
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4147199
fbshipit-source-id: feb335eb8687a1b7939ee8cd8649e455e0c069a9
Summary:
- Revise scripts to generate Java and C# unittests using the same HTML fixtures as well as C for code coverage.
- Add wrap_column test workaround in gentest.js.
- Add checkDefaultValues for sanity check of the CSSLayout default values by test-template.html
- Add `align-content: flex-start;` in default div to align with CSSLayout default
$ cd csharp/gentest
$ ruby gentest.rb
- macOS example for C#
$ cd csharp/tests/Facebook.CSSLayout
$ clang -DCSS_ASSERT_FAIL_ENABLED -Wall -Wextra -dynamiclib -o libCSSLayout.dylib -g -I../../.. ../../../CSSLayout/*.c ../../CSSLayout/CSSInterop.cpp
$ mcs -debug -t:library -r:nunit.framework.dll -out:CSSLayoutTest.dll *.cs ../../../csharp/Facebook.CSSLayout/*cs
$ mono64 --debug nunit-console.exe CSSLayoutTest.dll
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4053777
fbshipit-source-id: 84450208015e65baf604987bd56c6a268598b545
