Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nick Gerleman
c60050d0cb Fixup hack for flex line size calculation (#1380)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1380

X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/39433

Back when rolling out flex gap, we encountered a bug where gap was added to the end of the main axis when a size was not specified.

During flex line justification/sizing, we calculate the amount of space that should be in between children. We erroneously add this, even after the last child element.

For `justify-content`, this space between children is derived from free space along the axis. The only time we have free space is if we had a dimension/dimension constraint already set on the parent. In this case, the extra space added to the end of the flex line is usually never noticed, because we bound `maxLineMainDim` to container dimension constraints at the end of layout, and the error doesn't effect how any children are positioned or sized.

There was at least one screenshot test where this issue showed up though, and I was able to add a slightly different repro where we may have free space without a definite dimension by enforcing a min dimension and not stretching.

{F1091401183}

The new reference is correct, and looking back at diffs, is what this seemed to originally look like when added three years ago. Seems like there may have been a potential regression, but I didn't spot anything suspicious when I looked around the code history.

`betweenMainDim` may still be set for `gap` even if we don't have a sized parent, which makes the extra space propagated to `maxLineMainDim` effect parent size.

Because we were in a code freeze, I opted to have us go with a solution just effecting flex gap, instead of the right one, in case there were any side effects. This cleans up the code to use the right calculation everywhere, and fixes a separate bug, where `endOfLineIndex` and `startOfLineIndex` may not be the last/first in the line if they are out of the layout flow (absolutely positioned, or display: none_

See the original conversation on https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1188

Reviewed By: javache

Differential Revision: D49260049

fbshipit-source-id: 218552c5ff938668b9f257df7a1493e13ded4d0d
2023-09-14 20:26:31 -07:00
Nick Gerleman
0aec0a1ac4 Remove YGExperimentalFeatureFixAbsoluteTrailingColumnMargin (#1317)
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1317

X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/37374

This is edge-casey enough, and I actually broke this in D42282358 without us noticing (I changed height to width of the bottom usage, instead, copy/pasting the value of the top one).

Reviewed By: yungsters

Differential Revision: D45766764

fbshipit-source-id: b600b79b8436534fe48ef2acbfde8ba64068e593
2023-06-29 11:04:01 -07:00
Nick Gerleman
7e96b65790 Import "Fix percent absolute position and size calcuate different with web" behind experimental feature (#1028) (#1201)
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/issues/850

https://github.com/facebook/yoga/issues/850 describes a conformance issue where positioning of an absolute child using percentages is not calculated against the correct box size.

This takes the fix for that in https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1028, regenerates tests, and fixes tests so that the experimental feature can be enabled. Goal is to run this as an experiment internally to see if we can enable by default.

Changelog:
[Internal]

Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1201

Reviewed By: yungsters

Differential Revision: D42282358

Pulled By: NickGerleman

fbshipit-source-id: 57c0dd9b0f1c47cb9335ff6e13d44b4646e5fa58
2023-01-08 13:41:27 -08:00
Nick Gerleman
08eaae7223 Reorgnaize C++ tests
Summary:
This does some preprataion for the Yoga CMake Build. The main change is removing the dedicated testutil top-level-directory and static library. This contains a method to count nodes using the event functions exposed to C++, along with a Java binding for the test utility (since the events don't have a Java binding). It is only used in a single place in a way that isn't very useful, so it simplifies things to treat is as source in the existing C++ test library.

This also separates the hand-written and generated UTs, like we are doing in the JS directory in D42207782.

Reviewed By: christophpurrer

Differential Revision: D42247762

fbshipit-source-id: f8a270e99d0315ba7fc608f2471333e7a7be9d79
2022-12-28 01:21:52 -08:00