Summary: This is an API breaking change done to allow us to avoid an allocation during measurement. Instead we do the same trick as is done when passing measure results to C, we path them into a long.
Reviewed By: splhack
Differential Revision: D4081037
fbshipit-source-id: 28adbcdd160cbd3f59a0fdd4b9f1200ae18678f1
Summary: Clearly mark java CSSNode as deprecated. It will go away very soon.
Reviewed By: lucasr
Differential Revision: D3992775
fbshipit-source-id: b3ceca277e5c7426eb51f8cbeacf5e2fe451c6ec
Summary:
@public
This fixes measuring of items in the main axis of a container. Previously items were in a lot of cases measured with UNSPECIFIED instead of AT_MOST. This was to support scrolling containers. The correct way to handle scrolling containers is to instead provide them with their own overflow value to activate this behavior. This is also similar to how the web works.
This is a breaking change. Most of your layouts will continue to function as before however some of them might not. Typically this is due to having a `flex: 1` style where it is currently a no-op due to being measured with an undefined size but after this change it may collapse your component to take zero size due to the implicit `flexBasis: 0` now being correctly treated. Removing the bad `flex: 1` style or changing it to `flexGrow: 1` should solve most if not all layout issues your see after this diff.
Reviewed By: majak
Differential Revision: D3876927
fbshipit-source-id: 81ea1c9d6574dd4564a3333f1b3617cf84b4022f
Summary:
@public
Introduce `overflow:scroll` so that scrolling can be implemented without the current overflow:visible hackiness. Currently we use AT_MOST to measure in the cross axis but not in the main axis. This was done to enable scrolling containers where children are not constraint in the main axis by their parent. This caused problems for non-scrolling containers though as it meant that their children cannot be measured correctly in the main axis. Introducing `overflow:scroll` fixes this.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D3855801
fbshipit-source-id: 3c365f9e6ef612fd9d9caaaa8c650e9702176e77
Summary:
@public
Introduce `overflow:scroll` so that scrolling can be implemented without the current overflow:visible hackiness. Currently we use AT_MOST to measure in the cross axis but not in the main axis. This was done to enable scrolling containers where children are not constraint in the main axis by their parent. This caused problems for non-scrolling containers though as it meant that their children cannot be measured correctly in the main axis. Introducing `overflow:scroll` fixes this.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D3855801
fbshipit-source-id: 6077b0bcb68fe5ddd4aa22926acab40ff4d83949
Summary:
When an absolutely positioned node appeared inside an overflow:hidden
parent, we were limiting its height. This is inconsistent with how
layout behaves on the web.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/pull/218
Reviewed By: lucasr
Differential Revision: D3797285
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 98f98e77aa26edce86b9882c1cac284799b69a27
Summary: Revert changes to flex-basis as it broke some specific layouts. Will update later with a more comprehensive set of tests
Differential Revision: D3776987
fbshipit-source-id: 06bd154a36f895782f45511cd8cf49cc6d7cbe7d
Summary: Generate tests for flex-properties and fix bug where flex basis was not taken into account when parent main dimension was undefined.
Differential Revision: D3771513
fbshipit-source-id: 1b5edc7a28bb26217e8a6d10d1829d9031c3ae2e
Summary: Implement flexShrink flexGrow and flexBasis in java as well because it will take a bit until the java code is removed
Reviewed By: lucasr
Differential Revision: D3753231
fbshipit-source-id: ea41d887cd99d1f03d2bc876a2fd7141dbe48320
Summary:
@public The current CSSLayout can't support RTL because wrong calculation for absolute position.
This change is mainly to fix the issue: https://github.com/facebook/css-layout/issues/197
Three main problems I fixed:
1. Calculate the position in the same way as margin, boarder, and padding. So that to fix the absolute problem.
2. Fix one wrong calculation for leading value when we only know the trailing value. It was hard code for the LTR situation. Now I changed it to depends on the main Axis.
3. Expose getter and setter function for RN to read layout direction and start/end position value.
Reviewed By: fkgozali
Differential Revision: D3616949
fbshipit-source-id: ae7a47cc0a5d02b42b95f87232be51ab144056d9
