Summary:
@public
This reverts the Yoga/Java storage experiment. I will follow up with any learnings.
Reviewed By: pasqualeanatriello
Differential Revision: D9168405
fbshipit-source-id: fb227fb9353bd4c4e3bebbe9b04eec1132e532e8
Summary:
@public
Adds another version of property storage for `YogaNode`, using `sun.misc.Unsafe`.
Adopts the stub concept from Litho for `Unsafe`, as it is hidden by the Android SDK.
Reviewed By: pasqualeanatriello
Differential Revision: D9140103
fbshipit-source-id: a4b376eca341b724a00f873467ae8bf8eaac69f4
Summary:
@public
Adds an implementation of `YogaNodeProperties` that sets style properties using a `ByteBuffer` rather than JNI calls.
We hope for a speed improvement.
Reviewed By: pasqualeanatriello
Differential Revision: D9042225
fbshipit-source-id: c7f2b24eaeddd1190755bec85a5034079bd2f492
Summary:
@public
Adds an implementation of `YogaNodeProperties` that accesses style and layout properties using a `ByteBuffer` rather than JNI calls.
We hope for a speed improvement.
This needs further cleanup after experimenting, e.g. to codegen the offsets.
Reviewed By: pasqualeanatriello
Differential Revision: D8911723
fbshipit-source-id: 3c24b57eb545155878896ebb5d64d4553eb6bedc
Summary:
@public
The existing test suite does not check every single style property settable in Java for defaults, reads, and effect on layout.
Here, we add these test, in order to make evolving the Java/C++ bridge as safe as possible.
Reviewed By: pasqualeanatriello
Differential Revision: D8952470
fbshipit-source-id: a94933adff01c313b3f440eb5207d2cb6a54a85d
Summary:
This diff includes the following changes:
1 ) I extended the Java implementation of YogaNode to be able to get a full copy of a YogaNode object without copying the List of children of the original YogaNode. In other words, the new copy of the YogaNode will have the same data of the original YogaNode, but with an empty list of children.
2 ) We created a new method in Yoga.cpp called YGNodeInsertSharedChild. This new method is going to be used by Fabric in order to temporarily share a YogaNode between two "Yoga Trees" (the "current Yoga" tree and a partial "clone of the current Yoga tree"). We exposed this new functionality in the java implementation of Yoga (method addSharedChildAt)
I'm including sebmarkbage for more context.
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D7245421
fbshipit-source-id: 72578c8261f29e4a12fc6c72a91f2f891cd58d48
Summary:
In the persistent version of Yoga, a YogaNode can be shared between two YogaTrees, that means that a YogaNode could have more than one Parent at one point in time. That's why the concept of Parent of a YogaNode is not a 1-1 relationship anymore.
This diff changes the semantic of Parent of a YogaNode to Owner of a Yoga Node. CC sebmarkbage and priteshrnandgaonkar for more context.
Technically this diff renames the field YogaNode.parent to YogaNode.owner (and every internal field, Getter and Setter that is related to parent)
Note that as part of this diff I also modified the CSSLayoutDEPRECATED version of Yoga in order to keep compatibility with the C++ implementation.
Reviewed By: priteshrnandgaonkar
Differential Revision: D7352778
fbshipit-source-id: dcf1af5e72bfc3063b5c4bda197d7952a9194768
Summary:
Earlier YGUndefined was NAN, but recently it was replaced with 10E20 and the check for `isUndefined` is as follows
```
public static boolean isUndefined(float value) {
return (Float.compare(value, (float) 10E8) >= 0 || Float.compare(value, (float) -10E8) <= 0);
}
```
If the number is in (-inf, -10E8] and [10E8, inf) then it is considered as undefined. Failing test passed values in this range, so thats why the test was failing. Current diff fixes this issue, and passes a big number which is outside the range as the result of measure function.
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D7272325
fbshipit-source-id: 81a77117c65c5dc0cec920f50f0735ec0a7433d1
Summary:
This diff exposes `shouldDiffLayoutWithoutLegacyStretchBehaviour` from YGConfig and `doesLegacyStretchFlagAffectsLayout` from YGLayout to YogaConfig and YogaNode respectively
Also added a positive test case. Didn't find the negative test case example. @[508947467:ianc] or @[759512522:emilsj], can you suggest a negative test case example.
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D7272067
fbshipit-source-id: e67e82eb057e4c7124904c715f9dca4dcfea21ea
Summary:
Includes React Native and its dependencies Fresco, Metro, and Yoga. Excludes samples/examples/docs.
find: ^(?:( *)|( *(?:[\*~#]|::))( )? *)?Copyright (?:\(c\) )?(\d{4})\b.+Facebook[\s\S]+?BSD[\s\S]+?(?:this source tree|the same directory)\.$
replace: $1$2$3Copyright (c) $4-present, Facebook, Inc.\n$2\n$1$2$3This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the\n$1$2$3LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Reviewed By: TheSavior, yungsters
Differential Revision: D7007050
fbshipit-source-id: 37dd6bf0ffec0923bfc99c260bb330683f35553e
Summary:
This diff exposes the YogaNode clone operation to JNI in order to be able to clone Java YogaNode objects.
The clone method performs a shallow copy of the java YogaNode.
I made YogaNode to implement Cloneable, I know that this might not be a good idea but in this case it simplifies the cloning mechanism. I am open to suggestions.
IMPORTANT NOTES:
- The current implementation IS NOT making a deep copy of the mData instance variable.
- The mParent Java instance variable will reference the parent of the original Java YogaNode, is that ok sebmarkbage?
Reviewed By: priteshrnandgaonkar
Differential Revision: D6935971
fbshipit-source-id: a2008f1eb849b5074585b48699b7de56d5ac90d4
Summary: This diff extends the JNI version of yoga in order to allow Java instances of the YogaConfig class to receive a callback when a Yoga node is cloned.
Reviewed By: priteshrnandgaonkar
Differential Revision: D6918605
fbshipit-source-id: e424c78680c04e21154ebe21405671c4e90f6529
Summary: Added a benchmark tests along with the usual gentest in yoga for a complex yoga android news feed view.
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D6753544
fbshipit-source-id: 23b8da9785990a86248ff4708ac61e12411eb489
Summary:
If you have a measurable node and set ```marign-left: auto``` + ```align-item:stretch``` on it, it won't get measured and they get a width/height of ```-(nan)```. This change fixes that behaviour. Fixes#644.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/645
Differential Revision: D6413512
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 755febeb33bb0d4520ca6b3c28d56ac333e4a14d
Summary:
Adds new ```space-evenly``` for ```justify-content```.
Also adds a typofix in one of the other justify-content tests.
Fixes#657
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/658
Differential Revision: D6407996
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: cc837409e1345624b4bd72c31e25fe68dcb0f6a3
Summary:
This fixes shrinking of elements which are in a non stretch alignment, but keeps the legacy stretch behaviour in place. Additionally this adds a testcase for ```useLegacyStretchBehaviour```
Fixes#633
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/635
Differential Revision: D6408037
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 377ab0308dd3a75a148a0af31ab5eb3ffb5b5d83
Summary:
The min/max inner width shouldn't take the margins into account.
Adds a test for both cases.
Fixes#664
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/665
Differential Revision: D6407982
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: ffa549a06f802263e3b8488e90756aa3f722d52d
Summary:
This fixes shrinking of elements which are in a non stretch alignment
Fixes#633
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/634
Differential Revision: D5874862
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 1426aa6b60f6ba42c2be702e6f24cea935ab7acb
Summary:
The only thing I found in the spec for this change is the following. Not exactly sure if this is the thing this PR is about:
> For each flex item, subtract its outer flex base size from its max-content contribution size. If that result is not zero, divide it by (if the result was positive) its **flex grow factor floored at 1** or (if the result was negative) by its scaled flex shrink factor, having **floored the flex shrink factor at 1**. This is the item’s max-content flex fraction.
But at least it seems a required change.
Fixesfacebook/yoga#566
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/572
Differential Revision: D5264388
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 0004d1c3b9bad070a98cd6766c1adc06a54475f8
Summary:
This is a fix on top of 56b10fc. It takes the case into account were you have `wrap-reverse` and `align-items: flex-end` set.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/568
Differential Revision: D5155521
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 7e5fcfa2fbb48b6c6279da46cc648a071ff2b079
Summary:
1, Change bottom to be based� on height of parent.
2, Respect margin value when layout with right/bottom.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/552
Differential Revision: D5102090
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: dca291413ffc2027d7628f4c8b8eeeb0b4823bc2
Summary: We should always try to make root node as small as possible, while previously this wasn't functioning this way
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D5071164
fbshipit-source-id: b8afef42477d0ed87d0c9fcfd26349e0a0babd6e
Summary: Include margin when calculating if children overflow
Reviewed By: passy
Differential Revision: D5044471
fbshipit-source-id: e7c1eb694445ffb898bcf375d9deefc558c49f11
Summary: Fix flex basis not being constraint to the max size in the main direction. Previously this caused the added test to fail due to NaN in child dimensions.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D5044314
fbshipit-source-id: d9f9db832e4943a57a89c9d162ff6077b709795a
Summary:
Moves the `YGLogger` into `YGConfig` and pass the `YGNodeRef` into the logger to be able to associate the log messages and assertions with the specific node.
Tackles facebook/yoga#530 and facebook/yoga#446
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/531
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4970149
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: b7fcdaa273143ea2fa35861620b2e4d79f04f0af
Summary:
Fixes the sizing of items so that under most scenarios it calcultes its height by it's content for non exact measurings. This introduces a new useLegacyStretchBehaviour flag on the config to opt out of this change as it is breaking.
See facebook/yoga#505
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/506
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4954016
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: d28bd5d174cd76951fb94df85e3b0cfab7f81ff7
Summary: Rounding has been successfully adopted by multiple products and frameworks. Time to move it out of experimental mode. Rounding can still be turned of by setting the point scale factor to 0 on the config.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D4953838
fbshipit-source-id: 3ee5f27d92f95b3ed4a01c98bc35e9157f2e91c5
Summary:
Fixes `flex-wrap` with a max constraint and `justify-content`. Fixesfacebook/yoga#514.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/519
Differential Revision: D4953727
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 32dec48220be1392ea8dac5f34871d407eb8d49b
Summary:
This diff introduces new, little bit sophisticated round-to-pixel-grid algorithm.
**Motivation:**
Previous simple and straightforward solution works in most cases but sometimes produce the not-so-great result. A while ago Nick Lockwood described this problem and proposed the solution in RN's RCTShadowView class:
For example, say you have the following structure:
// +--------+---------+--------+
// | |+-------+| |
// | || || |
// | |+-------+| |
// +--------+---------+--------+
Say the screen width is 320 pts so the three big views will get the following x bounds from our layout system:
{0, 106.667}, {106.667, 213.333}, {213.333, 320}
Assuming screen scale is 2, these numbers must be rounded to the nearest 0.5 to fit the pixel grid:
{0, 106.5}, {106.5, 213.5}, {213.5, 320}
You'll notice that the three widths are 106.5, 107, 106.5.
This is great for the parent views but it gets trickier when we consider rounding for the subview. When we go to round the bounds for the subview in the middle, it's relative bounds are {0, 106.667} which gets rounded to {0, 106.5}. This will cause the subview to be one pixel smaller than it should be. This is why we need to pass in the absolute position in order to do the rounding relative to the screen's grid rather than the view's grid. After passing in the absolutePosition of {106.667, y}, we do the following calculations:
absoluteLeft = round(absolutePosition.x + viewPosition.left) = round(106.667 + 0) = 106.5
absoluteRight = round(absolutePosition.x + viewPosition.left + viewSize.width) + round(106.667 + 0 + 106.667) = 213.5
width = 213.5 - 106.5 = 107
You'll notice that this is the same width we calculated for the parent view because we've taken its position into account.
I believe this is awesome. I also believe that we have to decouple this logic from RN and put it into awesome Yoga. So I did it in this diff.
**Fun fact:**
The original implementation of this algorithm in RN had (and still have) a bug, which was found by Dustin dshahidehpour and fixed in D4133643. Therefore that diff was unlanded because it broke something unrelated inside RN text engine. I will fix that problem in RN later.
**Why do we need to change test methodology?**
Because the way we receive layout metrics from Chrome browser actually directly related to rounding problem. Previously we used `offsetHeight` and `offsetWidth` properties of the DOM node, which contain naively rounded values from `computedStyle` or `getBoundingClientRect`. (Which is we are trying to fix!) So, I added the new function that computes node size using two-step-rounding approach, conceptually similar to one that implemented in Yoga. Note: Chrome browser performs rounding layout as part of rendering process and actual values that can ve computed by counting actual pixel are different from these natively rounded ones.
**Why do some tests now have different desired values?**
These changes actually prove that my approach is correct and more useful for actual view rendering goals. So, let's take a look at test with changed values `rounding_fractial_input_3`:
Previously: 64+25+24=114 (Incorrect!)
Now: 65+24+25=114 (Correct!)
Previously: 64+25+24=114 (Incorrect!)
Now: 65+24+25=114 (Correct!)
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4941266
fbshipit-source-id: 07500f5cc93c628219500e9e07291438e9d5d36c
Summary: This diff corrects the fix to be limited only to cases when either element itself or all of it's children can't be flexed
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D4915189
fbshipit-source-id: efccee2fe39ed0f474a41dc3250d24c546f3f5d9
Summary:
Fixes the sizing of items so that under most scenarios it calcultes its height by it's content for non exact measurings. See facebook/yoga#505
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/506
Differential Revision: D4878875
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: ab1174ac7a76dcf20aae7b29a3bc396e11077c4d
Summary:
If a min constraint exists. It incorrectly reduces the available space by that amount. This adds a test and fix for this.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/501
Differential Revision: D4867146
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: ceafe070bfe7f501929d316656ac44c4e1753059
Summary:
If the root node has a position and we have a RTL layout, that position must be like LTR direction. See #477.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/502
Differential Revision: D4867144
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: b5ad3d87e7054090da12d7665a3d1abe8496a548
Summary:
This fixes ```align-content: center``` and ```align-content: flex-end``` when the child exceeds the parents size. See #476. It also fixes those layouts if the child has ```margin: auto``` set.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/477
Differential Revision: D4697833
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: d081ec7ea559a5f2bd3271c3a4dc272960beddfa
Summary:
We need to take the margin into account if we clip on max dimension. Fixes#466.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/467
Differential Revision: D4681342
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: 56311df9864a284d553c31f1c6db382f337f1fad
Summary: Add test covering a nested percentage container inside of a unconstraint container. This is something we ran into recently and want to make sure to cover in tests.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4637519
fbshipit-source-id: a8fe3c7702c2ea0ad954cce80fbdf953bb23c997
Summary: Some of the tests were not generated correctly. most likely due to a rebase.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4637539
fbshipit-source-id: 196478d7e5197519af9ab05e5134e6fb7d22b992
Summary:
Move configuration to new ```YGConfig``` and pass them down to CalculateLayout. See #418 .
Adds ```YGConfigNew()``` + ```YGConfigFree```, and changed ```YGSetExperimentalFeatureEnabled``` to use the config.
New function for calculation is ```YGNodeCalculateLayoutWithConfig```.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/432
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4611359
Pulled By: emilsjolander
fbshipit-source-id: a1332f0e1b21cec02129dd021ee57408449e10b0
