Summary: This change applies all Arcanist recommended lint changes, which amounts to changing copyright headers and some cases of whitespace changes.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D40060899
fbshipit-source-id: b62f9472e6ef58a3fc3d22eed661578a2635cb1f
Summary:
`/*` is the standard throughout open source code. For example, Firefox uses single /*: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/file/21d22b2f541258d3d1cf96c7ba5ad73e96e616b5/gfx/ipc/CompositorWidgetVsyncObserver.cpp#l3
In addition, Rust considers `/**` to be a doc comment (similar to Javadoc) and having such a comment at the beginning of the file causes `rustc` to barf.
Note that some JavaScript tooling requires `/**`. This is OK since JavaScript files were not covered by the linter in the first place, but it would be good to have that tooling fixed too.
Reviewed By: zertosh
Differential Revision: D15640366
fbshipit-source-id: b4ed4599071516364d6109720750d6a43304c089
Summary:
I've noticed that when a child's size is determined by `align-items: stretch` in combination with `aspect-ratio` its size is wrongly calculated to account for margin in the main axis when there is more than enough space.
See playground: https://goo.gl/tgW6cD
I've yet to figure out exactly how to solve this but i've started by writing a failing test when can be seen in the first commit here.
I assumed I had found the bug here https://github.com/facebook/yoga/blob/master/yoga/Yoga.cpp#L1838 where margin is being subtracted from the desired width even though the measure mode tells it to measure to exactly that size. However, if we don't remove this margin from the available width then 15 tests fail (including the one I just added) not quite figured out why yet. I'm also a bit confused at to why this would only happen for nodes with `aspect-ratio` and not for nodes where an explicit height and width is set.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/834
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D13223579
Pulled By: davidaurelio
fbshipit-source-id: 6970e6072e79f3bb6f9097355ab6e441441bfd88
Summary: This change drops the year from the copyright headers and the LICENSE file.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D9727774
fbshipit-source-id: df4fc1e4390733fe774b1a160dd41b4a3d83302a
Summary:
Includes React Native and its dependencies Fresco, Metro, and Yoga. Excludes samples/examples/docs.
find: ^(?:( *)|( *(?:[\*~#]|::))( )? *)?Copyright (?:\(c\) )?(\d{4})\b.+Facebook[\s\S]+?BSD[\s\S]+?(?:this source tree|the same directory)\.$
replace: $1$2$3Copyright (c) $4-present, Facebook, Inc.\n$2\n$1$2$3This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the\n$1$2$3LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree.
Reviewed By: TheSavior, yungsters
Differential Revision: D7007050
fbshipit-source-id: 37dd6bf0ffec0923bfc99c260bb330683f35553e
Summary:
When the following conditions are met, the main size become smaller by the margins in the main axis.
* The aspect ratio is defined
* The main size is not defined
* The cross size is defined
* The main margin is defined
This is because the main margin size is not included when calculating the main size from the aspect ratio.
Closes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/715
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D6998988
Pulled By: priteshrnandgaonkar
fbshipit-source-id: f6f69c47ece17bd7c5e41517b96032bf0c149356
Summary: Moved c implementation of `YGNode` to C++ struct. Not moving to C++ class as the React Classes dependent on `Yoga.h` assume it to be C. Thats why keeping `Yoga.h` C compatible. Sorry for the long diff, didn't thought that it will turn out to be this much big.Will keep an eye on number of lines next time 😉
Reviewed By: emilsjolander
Differential Revision: D6592257
fbshipit-source-id: 641e8b9462ad00731a094511f9f5608b23a6bb21
Summary:
@public
== Before ==
- Aspect ratio would do its best to fit within it's parent constraints
- Aspect ratio would prioritize `alignItems: stretch` over other sizing properties.
== After ==
- Aspect ratio is allowed to make a node grow past its parent constraints. This matches many other aspects of flexbox where parent constraints are not treated as hard constraints but rather as suggestions.
- Aspect ratio only takes `alignItems: stretch` into account if no other size definition is defined. This matches the interaction of other properties with `alignItems: stretch`.
== Updating your code ==
**You probably don't need to do anything** but in case something does break in your product it should be as easy as adding `{width: '100%', height: '100%', flexShrink: 1}` to the style declaring the `aspectRatio`.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D5639187
fbshipit-source-id: 603e8fcc3373f0b7f2461da2dad1625ab59dcb19
Summary: Fix flex basis not being constraint to the max size in the main direction. Previously this caused the added test to fail due to NaN in child dimensions.
Reviewed By: gkassabli
Differential Revision: D5044314
fbshipit-source-id: d9f9db832e4943a57a89c9d162ff6077b709795a
Summary: aspect ratio did not account for the widths and heights being including padding. This diff fixes that.
Reviewed By: astreet
Differential Revision: D4473024
fbshipit-source-id: 5a747e2f267b077203bb3b63e4c152847dc30774
Summary: Allow aspect ratio to expand beyond bounds of parent as is generally accepted in css
Reviewed By: passy
Differential Revision: D4397547
fbshipit-source-id: d2b1ca7b096f2f17b3efbd8f47a50678bfe7bb5f
Summary:
@public
AspectRatio is a new addition and soon after introduction we noticed use cases which is did not support. Specifically we wanted to support a node being as large as possible within a container while maintaining an arbitrary aspect ratio. This was not possible due to the low priority of AspectRatio, by increasing the priority of AspectRatio this is now possible as FlexGrow will grow an item to fit its parent unless the AspectRatio makes it too big in the cross axis, the AspectRatio will now override the FlexGrow in the main axis in that case.
Differential Revision: D4346720
fbshipit-source-id: 1f15613604190e3ad5ff4a467ba57db4bcfd2741
Summary:
@public
Aspect ratio being defined as width/height or height/width depending on the situation it was used in turned out to be very confusing. This diff makes aspect ratio always be defined as width/height irregardless of the usage.
Differential Revision: D4339132
fbshipit-source-id: e5da32750b55ddaf6acaf1cbd7662d86f2b480c3
