Summary: Now that the tests are passing let's not skip it anymore. Also adding errata tests to make sure most prod builds are still protected.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D50390993
fbshipit-source-id: cb91a7a377e919eaca24fb25e3d73d3c92eb8931
Summary:
These tests were a bit weird for testing something with position. The gentest setup makes it so that the fixtures are wrapped in a absolutely positioned container with height and width bot 0. However, the generated yoga tests do NOT do this and instead have the root node as the fixture itself with no wrapping container.
This causes a problem when testing left/right/top/bottom position insets. Because left/right/top/bottom will position the element relative to its containing block when position is absolute, we will get different values on yoga and chrome even if the implementation is correct: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/right#description
To fix this, we just wrap the fixture in a set size div that is also absolutely positioned.
The file was also formatted.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D50389229
fbshipit-source-id: ecd23939b973225cfb0611dc87f30c262952c5fc
Summary:
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/41019
### Changes made
- Regenerated tests (as some aspect ratio tests seem to be out of date compared to the fixtures)
- Added SpaceEvenly variant to the "Align" enums (via enums.py)
- Implemented `align-content: space-evenly` alignment in CalculateLayout.cpp
- Added generated tests `align-content: space-evenly`
- Updated NumericBitfield test to account for the fact that the Align enum now requires more bits (this bit could do with being reviewed as I am not 100% certain that it's valid to just update the test like this).
### Changes not made
- Any attempt to improve the spec-compliance of content alignment in general (e.g. I think https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1013 probably still needs to happen)
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1422
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D50305438
Pulled By: NickGerleman
fbshipit-source-id: ef9f6f14220a0db066bc30db8dd690a4a82a0b00
Summary: this is fixed now so we can turn it on
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D50348206
fbshipit-source-id: 61c2a72164c6f0ee91b1b5b576d3f129e8cfbe40
Summary: after looking into the issue described in https://github.com/facebook/yoga/issues/1208 it seems to apply to position too, so adding tests to confirm
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D50154056
fbshipit-source-id: 64dd04ce3ad765526a547fe60b699b664f251c06
Summary: after looking into the issue described in https://github.com/facebook/yoga/issues/1208 it seems to apply to border too, so adding tests to confirm
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D50153472
fbshipit-source-id: a50f3e040153086b6a573924b513919dbb94f3c0
Summary: after looking into the issue described in https://github.com/facebook/yoga/issues/1208 it seems to apply to padding too, so adding tests to confirm
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D50153085
fbshipit-source-id: bad0ef50389a71a45ec3a58d87c1dea0c2b26024
Summary:
Yoga has a known bug where marginStart and marginEnd will swap with row-reverse flex direction. This is not the intended behavior. On Paper this is also an issue with marginLeft and marginRight (at least we think Paper is the culprit, not exactly clear yet).
margin-start (and end) is not actually valid css. The gentest.rb script will just turn this into margin-left, but the cpp generated will properly test marginStart. This seems a bit weird to be since marginStart != marginLeft AFAIK. Things like RTL and LTR modes might make this test not exactly right. But given how many other tests depend on this quirk I think it is fine to add as is - the end result is the same after all. If not, a followup would be to add support for mapping margin-inline-start (valid css) to marginStart.
Anyway, this diff is to add test coverage for this scenario. Next stop is to actually try to fix this problem, which may be a bit harder :P
See https://github.com/facebook/yoga/issues/1208 for more info.
Reviewed By: NickGerleman
Differential Revision: D49744271
fbshipit-source-id: 75b8dd0cc5c53b2f338476fb70b60006aaa89054
Summary:
If the first element of a line is not contributing (e.g. position absolute), an additional gap will be added to the line, because the first gap element of the line is never identified (wrong start index).
Fix: raise the index of the first line element until we find an element that is contributing to the line.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1408
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D49722065
Pulled By: NickGerleman
fbshipit-source-id: 1068cb0b11ae4b04ec8d063e70540cce06181d5a
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1380
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/39433
Back when rolling out flex gap, we encountered a bug where gap was added to the end of the main axis when a size was not specified.
During flex line justification/sizing, we calculate the amount of space that should be in between children. We erroneously add this, even after the last child element.
For `justify-content`, this space between children is derived from free space along the axis. The only time we have free space is if we had a dimension/dimension constraint already set on the parent. In this case, the extra space added to the end of the flex line is usually never noticed, because we bound `maxLineMainDim` to container dimension constraints at the end of layout, and the error doesn't effect how any children are positioned or sized.
There was at least one screenshot test where this issue showed up though, and I was able to add a slightly different repro where we may have free space without a definite dimension by enforcing a min dimension and not stretching.
{F1091401183}
The new reference is correct, and looking back at diffs, is what this seemed to originally look like when added three years ago. Seems like there may have been a potential regression, but I didn't spot anything suspicious when I looked around the code history.
`betweenMainDim` may still be set for `gap` even if we don't have a sized parent, which makes the extra space propagated to `maxLineMainDim` effect parent size.
Because we were in a code freeze, I opted to have us go with a solution just effecting flex gap, instead of the right one, in case there were any side effects. This cleans up the code to use the right calculation everywhere, and fixes a separate bug, where `endOfLineIndex` and `startOfLineIndex` may not be the last/first in the line if they are out of the layout flow (absolutely positioned, or display: none_
See the original conversation on https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1188
Reviewed By: javache
Differential Revision: D49260049
fbshipit-source-id: 218552c5ff938668b9f257df7a1493e13ded4d0d
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1317
X-link: https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/37374
This is edge-casey enough, and I actually broke this in D42282358 without us noticing (I changed height to width of the bottom usage, instead, copy/pasting the value of the top one).
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D45766764
fbshipit-source-id: b600b79b8436534fe48ef2acbfde8ba64068e593
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1287
Outputs tests as TypeScript, along with using/testing the new form of enums imported directly from the package.
We need to change how we are telling Jest which variant to run, so that tests can import enums from "yoga-layout" and have it resolve to the entrypoint which has a binary which has already been built.
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D45723545
fbshipit-source-id: 887d929344a78cadec159a07c643b74b76b87c6c
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1286
This can be marked in fixtures to skip a test without commenting it out. We add one more usage of this.
The same functionality existed (unused) before for `experiments`, which I changed to `data-experiments`.
Formatting of JS tests changed to be closer to what Prettier would output, and to remove usage of `Yoga.UNDEFINED` which doesn't existi and just resolves to `undefined` (this is converted to NaN by the wrapper layer).
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D45723003
fbshipit-source-id: 337af319ab1c1c12047d6579da8c7e63b4f1537a
Summary:
Fixes https://github.com/facebook/yoga/issues/850https://github.com/facebook/yoga/issues/850 describes a conformance issue where positioning of an absolute child using percentages is not calculated against the correct box size.
This takes the fix for that in https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1028, regenerates tests, and fixes tests so that the experimental feature can be enabled. Goal is to run this as an experiment internally to see if we can enable by default.
Changelog:
[Internal]
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1201
Reviewed By: yungsters
Differential Revision: D42282358
Pulled By: NickGerleman
fbshipit-source-id: 57c0dd9b0f1c47cb9335ff6e13d44b4646e5fa58
Summary:
Yoga's JavaScript bindings do not work past Node 10, or on recent versions of Ubuntu even using it. This is due to a reliance on `nbind`, a library which is no longer maintained. `nbind` itself abstracts over `embind` running Emscripten to generate an asm.js build, along with building Node native modules. In the meantime, [yoga-layout-prebuilt](https://www.npmjs.com/package/yoga-layout-prebuilt) has been used by the community instead of the official package.
https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1177 was contributed as a conversion of bindings created using `nbind` to instead use `embind` directly.
I continued building on this to add more:
1. WebAssembly support (required to be async in browsers)
2. CMake + Ninja Build for the 4 flavors
3. TypeScript typings (partially generated)
4. yarn scripts to build (working on macOS, Ubuntu, Windows)
5. A README with some usage and contribution instructions
6. Updated tests to work with Jest, and updated general infra
7. ESLint and clang-format scripts
8. More GitHub actions (and now testing Windows)
9. Probably more I kinda got carried away here lol
The plan is to eventually publish this to NPM, but there is a little bit of work after this before that happens.
Pull Request resolved: https://github.com/facebook/yoga/pull/1177
Test Plan: The bindings pass Jest tests (both manual and generated). GitHub actions added for the different yarn scripts. Did some manual checks on using the library as TS.
Reviewed By: christophpurrer
Differential Revision: D42207782
Pulled By: NickGerleman
fbshipit-source-id: 1dc5ce440f1c2b9705a005bbdcc86f952785d94e
